@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 3 months agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzimagemessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up1974arrow-down152cross-posted to: opticalillusions@feddit.nl
arrow-up1922arrow-down1imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square154fedilinkcross-posted to: opticalillusions@feddit.nl
minus-square@xthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoI wasn’t saying everyone was looking at the same image. I’m saying the optical illusion still works when using a single image.
minus-square@bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoSure but I never disputed that. I’m saying this effects are real and there was some confusion due to the above.
minus-square@xthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-square@bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
I wasn’t saying everyone was looking at the same image. I’m saying the optical illusion still works when using a single image.
Sure but I never disputed that. I’m saying this effects are real and there was some confusion due to the above.
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?