@SomeoneElse@lemmy.caM to Murdered by Words@feddit.uk • 6 months agogotdamnfedia.ioimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1601arrow-down123file-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up1578arrow-down1imagegotdamnfedia.io@SomeoneElse@lemmy.caM to Murdered by Words@feddit.uk • 6 months agomessage-square31fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-square@Droggelbecher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink13•6 months agoI wouldn’t say so, and for the same reason they claim water isnt wet i claim water is wet: unless it’s just a single molecule, water touches (and even clings to) water. So water is wet.
minus-square@Akareth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months ago What if you have two molecules of H2O that are below 0°C or above 100°C? What if you have two molecules of some other liquid substance that are also polar like H2O?
minus-square@Droggelbecher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•6 months agoI’d say that the liquid phase is implied. Nobody is arguing whether a solid is wet. And this is just by feel, but I’d say yes. Wetness is polar liquids sticking to stuff.
I wouldn’t say so, and for the same reason they claim water isnt wet i claim water is wet: unless it’s just a single molecule, water touches (and even clings to) water. So water is wet.
I’d say that the liquid phase is implied. Nobody is arguing whether a solid is wet.
And this is just by feel, but I’d say yes. Wetness is polar liquids sticking to stuff.