In an open letter to publishers, more than 30,000 readers, researchers, and authors begged for access to the books to be restored in the open library, claiming the takedowns dealt “a serious blow to lower-income families, people with disabilities, rural communities, and LGBTQ+ people, among many others,” who may not have access to a local library or feel “safe accessing the information they need in public.”

During a press briefing following arguments in court Friday, IA founder Brewster Kahle said that “those voices weren’t being heard.” Judges appeared primarily focused on understanding how IA’s digital lending potentially hurts publishers’ profits in the ebook licensing market, rather than on how publishers’ costly ebook licensing potentially harms readers.

  • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    16 months ago

    They waited until they were sued to stop.

    If you get caught speeding, the judge doesn’t throw out the ticket because you slowed down as the cop pulled you over.

    • arglebargle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      They really brought attention to themselves. But if I understand it the current discussion is about if all books need to be removed, or can they have controlled lending.

      • @trafficnab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Correct, the entire concept of physically backed digital lending is being threatened, and many physical libraries contracted with IA to digitize their books and then facilitate digitally lending their physical copies to their patrons