@return2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml • 5 months agoWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-linkWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.com@return2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml • 5 months agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@delirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilink0•5 months agoI, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
minus-square@atzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoThere are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
minus-square@delirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilink-1•5 months agoThere are more than 2 candidates.
I, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
There are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
There are more than 2 candidates.
Good luck with that.