• @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Can’t imagine what sort of exculpatory evidence there could be

    Not being able to imagine something doesn’t mean it can’t exist.

    the simplest explanation is that it’s a smaller suburb of Dallas-Ft Worth

    Suburbs don’t prosecute, the county DA does. This county voted for Biden in 2020, and it prosecuted 42 hate crimes in 2022.

    • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -15 months ago

      Suburbs don’t prosecute, the county DA does. And this county voted for Biden in 2020.

      You’re right, and Presidential elections don’t do a good job of showing anything about local matters. Gotta look at the local elections. Since you brought it up…

      In the 2022 general election the County Clerk, Criminal District Attorney, Constable, District Clerk, and County Judge elected were all Republican. In fact, the only race not won by a Republican was one of 2 open County Commissioner seats, which a Dem barely won with 51.5% of the vote.

      Notice that Criminal District Attorney, Phil Sorrells ®, was just elected in 2022. Prior to that, he was a Judge for Tarrant County Criminal Court Number 10 for 25 years. I’d be willing to bet if someone went back through his criminal sentencing over those 25 years it would show certain, shall we say, biases in those sentences, they almost always do. Sometimes that quack does come from a duck after all.

      • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The previous DA was also a Republican, so it’s clear that Republicans are capable of prosecuting hate crimes.

        And I’d be willing to bet that Tarrant County charged as many hate crimes in 2023 as in previous years.

        • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -65 months ago

          I never said they weren’t capable. I’m just saying that this prosecutor seems to be choosing to not prosecute something seemingly obvious, which just makes them look incompetent. If they want to appear that way to the public, that’s their choice.

          Nothing prevents them from saying that they aren’t going to prosecute it as a hate crime due to exculpatory evidence, instead they seem to be intentionally leaving it in a grey area. Especially since this apparently happened a month ago according to the article. Plenty of time to figure out something so core to the issue. It just makes them look complicit in allowing hate crimes when the public evidence is so glaringly obvious for it.

          • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Nothing prevents them from saying that they aren’t going to prosecute it as a hate crime

            The thing that prevents them from saying that they aren’t going to prosecute it is that they are still considering prosecuting it.

            Deciding on a charging strategy takes a lot more thought than posting a hot take.

            EDIT: And let’s not forget that she is most definitely being charged with attempted murder, so no matter what the DA decides she’s gonna have a bad time.