• @TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75 months ago

    Taking away parking must be done while also providing alternatives, or you just have a bunch of homes and businesses that are inaccessible. This is especially the case if you want to integrate something like rail/tram access which has to have infrastructure considerations before construction even begins.

    “Build now, “fix” later” is exactly how we ended up in the situation we’re in now where they just keep throwing more and more buses at the problem.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      155 months ago

      “We can’t reduce parking until alternative transportation infrastructure is perfect” is inevitably paired with “we can’t build alternative infrastructure because there’s no demand for it [because of too much free parking].” It’s a dishonest tactic by concern-trolling reactionaries and “moderates” (in the “great stumbling block” to progress MLK sense) to manufacture an excuse to do nothing, every single time.

      I’ve been doing bike/ped/transit activist stuff for over a decade, and that’s the bullshit I’ve heard over and over and over and over. Y’all gotta stop falling for it!

      • Paige
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        “Can’t do a congestion charge until…” Is another I’ve heard lately

    • Nomecks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      You can’t though. People won’t let you raise taxes to pay for it unless it makes them absolutely miserable. Even with this move I’ll give it a 70/30 chance the municipal gov gets booted and minimums are reinstated.

    • @vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      we’re in now where they just keep throwing more and more buses at the problem.

      Sounds fine. Buses aren’t perfect but they are flexible and don’t require much infrastructure (ideally, they have a dedicated bus lane).