• 1bluepixel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    I was on Slashdot circa 1998 and people back then kept saying mainstream adoption was right around the corner. Meanwhile, 25 years later, the core barriers to entry have yet to be addressed. But Linux is gonna hit the mainstream any day now!

    I think the reason for that disconnect is that what a typical Linux user wants is very different from the mainstream desktop user. Linux users want flexibility and freedom, and they don’t mind getting their hands dirty and doing a little research to get there. They’re also patient with setbacks because they believe in FOSS and their privacy.

    Now, the Steam Deck’s success, I think, happens in spite of Linux. It’s a closed environnement with a very specific target hardware, so none of the usual problems with a desktop distro are gonna show up. And I’m not even sure that many Deck users realize they’re running games on Linux, to be honest. The Steam wrapper is really its own thing.

    I do wish Linux would make serious headway in the desktop space… It’s just frustrating to see that, 25 years on, the main strategy remains crossing fingers and whispering “any day now.”

    • @fulano@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      But a lot of things changed in these years. Installing software, for example, became so easy using the gnome store, that it lowered a lot the entry barrier.

      The few times I find myself using windows, I realize it’s not easy to use, as many claim. I believe it’s mostly a matter of a computer culture that created around it, and changing cultural traits is really hard

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Nothing has really changed. Imagine a typical user. You give them Linux, the user plugs their Blu Ray to watch a movie, distro complains about freedom and DRM, the user throws Linux away.

        No one gives a shit about open source philosophy or other esoteric bullshit, people just need to do cool stuff, do their jobs and watch movies. Gnome store is useless. Come back once I can install Photoshop on Linux directly from Adobe Web site.

        • @fulano@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          With all the respect, to deny the progress we had in the last decade seems a bit stubbornish and counterproductive.

          In the 2000s, uo to early 2010s, not even a basic non techy user could properly use linux without assistance, and nowadays, they can use it normally. Most of them just need a working browser and a good UI.

          I don’t say that out of nowhere. I’ve been doing some work in initiatives for digital inclusion in my country, and we’re having great results with linux nowadays, while it was impossible some years ago.

          There’s still a lot that needs improvement, but we’re nowhere near the state we were just one decade ago.

          • @Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Which progress? None of the professional software is available for Linux still, you still can’t watch 4K Netflix on Linux, etc, etc.

        • @danielton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Accurate. I used various Linux distros as my daily driver for 15 years (2004-2019), and I swear things are going backwards. I held out a little hope that Ubuntu was going to change everything for the better, but things aren’t getting any better. I bought a laptop from System76 in 2018 and had driver issues because the hardware was too new, which I was hoping to avoid by buying from a Linux-first company. Also, why the hell are they still selling laptops with nvidia built in?

          The Linux fanboys can deny these problems all they want, but too many still think the only way to use a computer is to make it as hard as possible for Linux to ever become mainstream. Android took off because it has an intuitive GUI in spite of being based on Linux.

        • Fubber Nuckin'
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          You can install mint or Ubuntu on your grandma’s laptop these days and she will have fewer issues than she had on Windows. I game on Linux and 95% of the time i just install and it runs.

          I wouldn’t say it’s ready for your average user yet, but to say it’s the same as it’s always been is just incorrect.

          • @Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Desktop Linux distros are playing catch up. Yeah, you can finally browse the internet, cool stuff! Now go watch 4K on Netflix. Maybe your grandma would be fine today, I don’t know. But a lot of people still need MS Office, for example. A lot of people still need to play DRM protected content. A lot of people still play games with anti-cheat. A lot of people still have printers which don’t work correctly under Linux.

            Meanwhile Windows literally has zero issues. For many years now. Or MacOS. Linux will never be ready, because being ready is a moving target.

            What should happen is simple: one single distro, all proprietary tech included by default, kernel ABI frozen for a reasonably long time, and user land should have backwards compatibility for at least five years.

    • @dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      Agreed on most points, but if you try to do anything unusual on Steam Deck like install Heroic Launcher or get emulators working, you fully realize you are on Linux.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        How many Nintendo Switch users install non sanctioned emulators and launchers? No one cares about this stuff, people just want to play games on the go. And Steam Deck delivers exactly that.