• @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        And how exactly does China’s claim work within unclos? The shoal is only 190nm away from the Philippines and should be part of the Philippines exclusive economic zone. If there is any questions of legitimate territorial claim it would be with Vietnam not China.

        Also, stopping any navigation within your own exclusive economic zone goes against unclos, let alone stopping navigation of a country in their own exclusive economic zone.

        • @filoria@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          -15 months ago

          What’s your point? The Philippines bases their entire claim on their interpretation of UNCLOS, but flouts it at every opportunity. International law for thee but not for me.

          • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            What’s your point?

            You seemed to be suggesting that what the Philippines is doing is breaking the rules of unclos, but you haven’t explained how.

            but flouts it at every opportunity. International law for thee but not for me.

            How? They are allowed to protect the resources in their exclusive economic zone. China on the other hand is still attempting to enforce a claim that was invalidated by international courts in 2016.

            Seems like you might be projecting on the behalf of China.

              • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                In the exclusive economic zone, the coastal State shall have the exclusive right to construct and to authorize and regulate the construction, operation and use of:

                (a) artificial islands;

                (b) installations and structures for the purposes provided for in article 56 and other economic purposes;

                © installations and structures which may interfere with the exercise of the rights of the coastal State in the zone.

                There no language in the EEZ article that mentions “territorial military outpost”.

      • @Poach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        You can’t beach a ship in your own territorial waters and then get upset when China comes to take your stuff and harass you? Do you understand what is even happening in the South China Sea?

          • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            55 months ago

            I think that’s more plausible than China’s claim that their exclusive economic zone stretches over a thousand miles off their coast, and supercedes both Vietnams and the Philippines exclusive economic zones…

            • @intelshill@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              Glad that we agree that the South China Sea is entirely vibes-driven and has no foundation in international law.

              • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                Nah, there’s pretty clear rules. It’s just that the main power in the region tends to ignore them when it suits them. Again, how is the Philippine government breaking international law?

                • @nekandro@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  05 months ago

                  IIRC you’re not allowed to set up territorial military outposts in EEZ, so OP is correct that the Philippines government is violating international law.

                  • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    15 months ago

                    According to who?

                    In the exclusive economic zone, the coastal State shall have the exclusive right to construct and to authorize and regulate the construction, operation and use of:

                    (a) artificial islands;

                    (b) installations and structures for the purposes provided for in article 56 and other economic purposes;

                    © installations and structures which may interfere with the exercise of the rights of the coastal State in the zone.

                    Can you link what article that falls under?