The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

  • @laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 months ago

    Like, maybe tiered to something like 5 years: pay what it costs now, 10 years: 10 times that cost, and 15 years: 100 times, with a hard cap at 15? I could get behind that.

    • @kryptonite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      5 years: pay what it costs now

      It doesn’t cost anything to copyright something. You just automatically own the copyright to something you create.

      (This may vary outside the US; I’m not familiar with international copyright law.)

    • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      Yeah. Something like that. Maybe don’t even need a cap.

      If you pay $2^n each year n to retain copyright then by year 30 you are into the billions.