• @Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    755 months ago

    Forgive my ignorance, but an apartment where the landlord is removed and people just pay building maintenance is… a condominium, no?

    • Scroll ResponsiblyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      915 months ago

      If they don’t individually own the property but pay for upkeep and there is no landlord… that’s a housing cooperative, no?

    • @Nommer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      315 months ago

      It’s more like co-owning. Both the owner and the HOA own the property. But at least with my HOA the agreement is they handle everything outside my walls, I handle everything inside.

      • paraphrand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 months ago

        I didn’t know about the co-ownership. That makes HOA stories make more sense.

        • BigFig
          link
          fedilink
          English
          135 months ago

          HOA is just a name, they take many many forms. My grandparents neighborhood for example has an HOA that collects dues and the dues are used to pay to have the roads repaved or fixed when damaged, and that’s it. No upkeep rules or anything like that, and there’s only a handful of houses in their small neighborhood that look bad from the outside, but that’s those people’s business

    • @Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      Depends who owns it / who payed to have it constructed. If the tenets own it and payed to have it constructed, or payed someone who payed someone… Then it’s a condo or a co-op depending on whether you own a unit in the building or own x% of the building which entitles you to a unit.

      If another organization, almost always some form of government, payed to have it constructed and owns it then it is public housing.

      If it’s anything like cities skylines original, houses just pop up according to demand with seemingly no construction cost calculated, probably because it would add a ton more complexity with mortgages and speculative markets etc. for little gain to players who mostly just want to play with trains and metros.

    • @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      If they don’t individually own the property but pay for upkeep and there is no landlord… that’s a housing cooperative, no?

      Squatter mansion.