Summary:

Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned about a possible drop in Black voter turnout for the 2024 presidential election, according to party insiders. The worries arise from a 10% decrease in Black voter turnout in the 2022 midterms compared to 2018, a more substantial decline than any other racial or ethnic group, as per a Washington Post analysis. The decline was particularly significant among younger and male Black voters in crucial states like Georgia, where Democrats aim to mobilize Black voter support for President Biden in 2024.

The Democratic party has acknowledged the need to bolster their outreach efforts to this demographic. W. Mondale Robinson, founder of the Black Male Voter Project, highlighted the need for Democrats to refocus their attention on Black male voters, who have shown lower levels of engagement. In response, Biden’s team has pledged to communicate more effectively about the benefits that the Black community has reaped under Biden’s administration, according to Cedric L. Richmond, a senior advisor at the Democratic National Committee.

However, Black voter advocates have identified deep-seated issues affecting Black voter turnout. Many Black men reportedly feel detached from the political process and uninspired by both parties’ policies. Terrance Woodbury, CEO of HIT Strategies, a polling firm, suggests that the Democratic party’s focus on countering Trump and Republican extremism doesn’t motivate younger Black men as much as arguments focused on policy benefits. Concerns are growing within the party that if they fail to address these issues, disenchanted Black voters might either abstain or, potentially, be swayed by Republican messaging on certain key issues.

    • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2711 months ago

      In 2020 there were double digits dems in the primary…

      In 2024 we’re expected to believe the only choice is Biden or a Republican.

      If you’re pissed “there’s no other nominee” be mad at the party leaders who aren’t allowing a primary. And realize there’s 100s of people qualified to run as a Dem

      • deweydecibel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Double digit nominees…that all lost to Biden.

        We gonna drag them up again? So they can lose again?

        • @Running_Out_Of_Plans@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1311 months ago

          … That’s what a primary is for. So people can, like, actually choose.

          There are a LOT of people who don’t want Biden for another four years. There are people who didn’t like him, but have warmed up to him.

          Would he win a primary? Yeah, probably, because of incumbent advantage.

          But that should be for people to decide.

          • @kbotc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            Cool. The requirements to force a debate are all posted publicly. Find someone who wants to stop Biden’s policies and run them.

          • @SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -111 months ago

            Fun fact: if an incumbent President has a Primary, they are exponentially more unlikely to win the Presidency again as it can easily be spun into a “vote of no confidence” narrative.

        • @randon31415@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          811 months ago

          There were four primaries in 2020 where the contest had candidates other than Biden and Bernie running. Biden lost three of them.

          46 primaries had no one under 70 running on either side.

    • @Upgrade2754@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      -711 months ago

      If the DNC didn’t say there would be no primary on day 1 then we might have actually been able to see people step forward. Marianne Williamson is at least running on the issues and is physically capable of having a two hour conversation. Biden… not so much

      • Silverseren
        link
        fedilink
        1811 months ago

        Marianne Williamson, the pseudoscience and conspiracy nutter that helped convince a bunch of people with HIV that medicine doesn’t work and praying and willpower would cure them instead?

      • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1011 months ago

        I don’t know why they’re so content to hitch themselves to terrible candidates. I’ve never in my life voted Republican, and the last time I was excited about a democratic nominee was Obama (RIP young idealistic me). Hillary had more baggage than a travelling circus, and felt a lot like just dead ass casting a vote for Goldman Sachs to run the oval office; Primary Biden made Jeb Bush seem like a live wire, besides not really having much to get excited about on his platform. Bernie was basically the only exciting thing the democrats have had going in soon to be over a decade now. The part has to do better.

        • DarkGamer
          link
          fedilink
          -111 months ago

          They had a lot of what I considered exciting candidates in the primaries; Yang, Sanders, and Warren come to mind. They didn’t win because they weren’t as viable or popular.

        • DigitalTraveler42
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          As if Biden wasn’t already a serious candidate with a provable winning record.

          Biden is clearly the better option and it shows by how much money the Republicans and the far right are dumping into “Democratic candidates” like RFK Jr and Dr. Cornell West. Which is also why the Right wingers and their “Democratic” proxies are the only ones trying to push for a democratic primary that would set a new precedent by primarying an incumbent Democratic President.

          The only person this infighting about these unqualified challengers to Biden helps is Trump or whatever MAGA loyalist that replaces him once Trump finally winds up in prison. (Hopefully)

        • @Upgrade2754@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          -611 months ago

          I think if there was a regular debate schedule it could have gotten interesting. But with the way it is now, you’re absolutely correct

          • @Chaser@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            I think Dem debates would absolutely help to hold Biden to more progressive positions but no one worth the limelight is running (I’m sure partially due to not holding an open primary). I think '28 is Newsome’s race to lose. He’s got name recognition and is a pretty good debater in conservative spaces so far. Not as progressive as I’d like but I’ve been saying that since I could vote

            • @Upgrade2754@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              He has definitely been positioning himself for it. The insulin moves are welcome, but the fact he let a single payer bill expire after promising to pass it leaves an all too familiar sting. But perhaps he can at least be moved on reducing prices for more pharmaceuticals and descheduling marijuana due to its legalization in CA. We’ll see.