• dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    105 months ago

    Which is why automatics have torque converters and manuals have clutches. It’s almost like we’ve come full circle or something!

    Millions and millions of vehicles are driving on the world’s roads right now, happily tooling along under the sound mechanical and physical principles known as “reality,” completely heedless of your apparent inability to understand it.

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -75 months ago

      Yes and a manual can slip the clutch, it’s built for that. A torque converter can’t slip the lock, it’s not build for that, it has to stay open. And that generates a fuckton of heat.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85 months ago

        And? Come on, you’re almost there. Just two more neurons to put together:

        That’s why the transmission cooler is there.

        Wrap up: Your original claim that Americans “can’t” tow due to predominantly driving automatic transmission cars, in addition to being an uncreative and tired thinly veiled attempt at insulting Americans, is not only wrong but also prima facie absurd.

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          And is the cooler in cars big enough to have noticeable towing capacity, or do you need a bigger one that only really fits a truck? How much additional radiator area do you need per additional ton of towing capacity (overcoming momentum, not tongue weight that can easily be zero just get a four-wheeled trailer)? For manuals, that’s zero additional radiator area. For automatics, I’ll leave the maths to you.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 months ago

            And is the cooler in cars big enough to have noticeable towing capacity

            Yes, it is. Do you realize that manufacturers publish a maximum towing capacity as part of their specifications for every vehicle? This is publicly available information, right there on the internet. It’s not a secret. The required surface area for the cooler is designed right in by the manufacturer for the transmission to work for the vehicle’s application. This not a case of something “extra” being added. It’s just how cars with automatic transmissions are built to begin with.

            The published towing capacity for most vehicles that are available in both automatic and stick are exactly the same. Would you care to guess why that is? You could have figured it out for yourself if you would bother to actually do some extremely minimal internet research instead of continuing to shoot your mouth off on whatever this ill-informed little crusade of yours is.

            Your initial claim is false. End of discussion. Just stop. You’re making a fool of yourself.

            • @barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -25 months ago

              Yes, it is. Do you realize that manufacturers publish a maximum towing capacity as part of their specifications for every vehicle?

              And have you compared EU spec manuals vs. American model versions? When it comes to specs there’s another big difference which I didn’t mention: Tongue weight. Which isn’t towing capacity and EU spec trailers have drastically lower tongue weight for their rated carrying capacity: Because we actually pull loads with light vehicles. As already said, put four wheels on a trailer and the tongue weight is practically zero. Our trailers also come with brakes.

              • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
                link
                fedilink
                English
                35 months ago

                What, so now you’re trying to split hairs over the regulatory differences between the US and Europe to attempt to distract from the fact that you still haven’t addressed making the following demonstrably false statements?

                • Your notion that automatic transmissions “need” active cooling that they “don’t” have when in fact they do, and
                • Your claim that torque converters “can’t” be locked during acceleration when they provably regularly are, and
                • Your claim that your engine “will stall” if the transmission can’t “slip” even while the vehicle is already in motion. (Hint: Get your car rolling, don’t touch the clutch, and take your foot off the accelerator pedal. Did it stall instantly? Did it stall when you got back on the accelerator, either? Of course it didn’t, because inertia is a process that exists.)
                • Bonus points for blathering about “trying to slip the lock of the converter,” which also makes no sense because that’s not how torque converter lockups work nor attempt to work, nor has anyone proposed they work that way.

                For the benefit of anyone else reading this, the difference in rated tow capacities between US spec and Euro spec vehicles is, as you have almost correctly observed, down to regulations and the trailer designs and not the tow vehicles themselves. There is no difference between the cars or their transmissions mechanically (nor the laws of physics – anywhere on the planet, I guarantee it). European regulations have two critical differences between the US, to wit:

                1. Vehicles towing trailers are typically limited to ~60 MPH or the equivalent, whereas in the US they are not (at least outside of some specific state laws).
                2. Tongue weight requirements are significantly lower, because nobody owns a body-on-frame truck which is necessary to support a high tongue weight.

                This is because it is dangerous to tow a low tongue weight trailer at high speed. America has no such speed or tongue weight restriction, and we also have interstates with 85 MPH speed limits. Thus our target tongue weight is roughly 15% of the total load, largely in order to keep the trailer under control at speed and prevent it from snaking all over the place and rolling itself and the vehicle. All other things being equal this ultimately winds up in the tongue weight being the limiting factor for most unibody vehicles. If your tongue weight is limited at e.g. 200 pounds, which it is for my bog standard Subaru Crosstrek, solving for the estimated tow capacity assuming 15% of it is 200 lbs would be roughly 1333 lbs. What’s the US spec rated tow capacity of a Crosstrek? Oh wow, it’s 1500 pounds. Imagine that. (For both the manual and automatic/CVT versions, by the way.)

                FYI, we also have trailer brakes over here, and many states require them to be used on loads exceeding 3000 pounds. Below that, the trucks most people use have adequate mass and braking capacity to handle towing trailer loads in and of themselves. It turns out, the actual reason Americans tow with trucks is because Americans tow with trucks, and our towing regulations and trailers are designed around the expectation of towing with trucks. It’s a just a cultural thing. No need to try to make it complicated nor make up fictitious bullshit about automatic transmissions.

                But none of this has anything to do with your original assertions re: automatic vs. manual transmissions. I’m not arguing any other points with you.

                As a matter of fact, I’m not arguing any more points with you at all. You have no idea how cars work. Go away.

                • @barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Your notion that automatic transmissions “need” active cooling that they “don’t” have when in fact they do,

                  I’m saying that to pull heavy loads they need active cooling. And they do. They also have cooling when not designed for heavy pulling, but they don’t need as much cooling because all the mechanics you literally agree with me over: More cooling is needed under heavier loads. This isn’t some far-out concept it’s physics, it’s what happens when you put oil in essentially a blender, it gets hot.

                  Then, and this seems to get ignored by you: Americans aren’t pulling heavy loads with cars. Why? Do you have an alternative explanation?

                  What’s the US spec rated tow capacity of a Crosstrek? Oh wow, it’s 1500 pounds.

                  1270 kg over here (with trailer brakes, 12% incline). That’s nearly twice. Tongue weight: 80kg. That’s less.

                  And that’s a Japanese SUV. You can get VW Golfs with 1.8t towing capacity, that’s a compact car. Also pure combustion ones, the Crosstrek is a hybrid it’s easy to get low-end torque with one of those and transmission is a whole another topic.

                  This is because it is dangerous to tow a low tongue weight trailer at high speed. America has no such speed or tongue weight restriction, and we also have interstates with 85 MPH speed limits.

                  That’s why trailer brakes exist and don’t pretend 140km/h are fast… though with a trailer you’re generally limited to 80 or 100 here, depending on make and whatnot. Maybe you should introduce speed limits, regulations for brakes on trailers, etc. Maybe you would if your small cars could even tow that much, physically. You should also start to use the left lane for overtaking only and get rid of those ludicrous amounts of stop signs and build your cities so that people can move in them, not just cars, but I’m digressing.