• @catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Nokia implemented stereo sound? Wow, welcome to 1881.

    Meanwhile, the vast majority of people making calls are still going to have only one speaker, so it’ll still get downmixed to mono. Even if your phone has two, and you’re not holding it next to one ear, they’re still going to be so close together as to effectively be one point source.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      If only they had developed some kind of companion technology that connected to the phone and directed separate audio channels to each of your ears. Eh, such a specialized device could never gain widespread adoption if stereo phone calls were the only practical use case.

    • @lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Meanwhile, the vast majority of people making calls are still going to have only one speaker, so it’ll still get downmixed to mono. Even if your phone has two, and you’re not holding it next to one ear, they’re still going to be so close together as to effectively be one point source.

      No, lots of (probably most) phones and other devices has stereo speakers.

      Either way headphones are most often used for this (you know like the thumbnail)

    • @snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This was true for TVs until it wasn’t.

      Edit: apparently some young whippersnappers don’t know TVs used to be mono before they were stereo, and now some TVs even have spatial sound.

      • @thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        i mean, people have innovated in the areas they care already.

        no one really cares that much about audio on phone calls. as long as they’re understandable.

        people added video because it adds to the communication. spatial audio will not. it will only become common if one or two of these mega corps decide to shoehorn it into ever device. not because people actually want it or care.

        might be a lucrative patent if we ever get holograms though

        • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          … You realize this has been innovated because someone cares, right?

          Like this is such a silly argument. “Why would we make cars not use steam? If people cared about it we would have already innovated!”

        • @14th_cylon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          i mean, people have innovated in the areas they care already

          so you are saying that all the innovation and research should be stopped, because if we care about any specific problem, it is already solved, and if it isn’t, it is proof we don’t care? 😆

          that… is not how it works.

            • @14th_cylon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              yeah, because in the world of audio/video content, who would care about quality of sound, right?

              and even if people would actually not care, it still doesn’t mean that someone won’t be able to sell it to them.

        • @Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You don’t need the tv for the surround sound, the speakers fit inside tiny devices you can put near each ear.

        • @snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          You can stream your video call to a TV right now, and spatial sound could help match the movement of the people on screen if the phone was stationary for a more immersive call.

          No need to haul anything around, just some creative thinking.