@zephyreks@lemmy.mlM to World News@lemmy.ml • 6 months agoU.S. Considers Expanded Nuclear Arsenal, a Reversal of Decades of Cutswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1178arrow-down17cross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up1171arrow-down1external-linkU.S. Considers Expanded Nuclear Arsenal, a Reversal of Decades of Cutswww.nytimes.com@zephyreks@lemmy.mlM to World News@lemmy.ml • 6 months agomessage-square65fedilinkcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-square@pingveno@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish0•6 months agoAgain, it’s not a matter of numbers. It’s a matter of maintaining a credible MAD threat so that any adversaries does not see nuclear war as a viable option. Nuclear weapons are meant to be brandished credibly as a response, not used.
minus-squarequeermunist she/herlinkfedilink4•6 months agoI’m pretty sure that numbers are how you present a credible MAD threat.
Again, it’s not a matter of numbers. It’s a matter of maintaining a credible MAD threat so that any adversaries does not see nuclear war as a viable option. Nuclear weapons are meant to be brandished credibly as a response, not used.
I’m pretty sure that numbers are how you present a credible MAD threat.