• @Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -86 months ago

    Also the IDF was fired upon when they raided. That makes this just war. Hamas chose the war zone.

    • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Also the IDF Hamas was fired upon when they raided in October. That makes this just war. Hamas Israel chose the war zone.

      Swap the word Hamas with israel every time you think there’s a great argument to post. Helps to avoid advocating for the murder of civilians like some crazy extremist.

      • @Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        An extremist would say that this can’t end until one side kills the other, so might as well get it over with.

        I don’t believe that. I think as humans we have an obligation to try for peace without murdering half a million people. Unlike most people here, I want to believe that someday both sides can find a way to peace.

        But if you insist that one side is good and one side is bad, then this can’t end well.

        • @Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          You’re also a racist that believes all Palestinians want to kill all Israelis.

          You state this openly, and then post a link to a study that doesn’t make that claim at all or anything resembling it and call it a source. Which, of course, isn’t how sources work. This is how sources work: https://lemmy.ml/post/15906506/11178832 The important bit there is that the source actually shows what I said it shows because I’m not a bad faith liar that enjoys justifying genocide.

          You’re already insisting one side is good and one side is bad when you intentionally, and surreptitiously lie to try and get people to think your racist statement is true, hoping they don’t actually click through to your so-called sources.

          So, please, pardon me if I don’t believe your bullshit pretending you want peace between the two sides.

            • @Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              05 months ago

              No, sources link by linking to the thing you say you’re linking to.

              In this example, I’m linking to your disgusting racist lie in your post that you also appended a source to that didn’t corroborate your racist lie.

              I’m going to be curious to see if you end up editing out the proof of your racism eventually in the future.

        • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 months ago

          I would argue that one side is fighting to achieve peace while the other side is fighting for the destruction of a population and the annexation of their land.

          Remind me again who is rejecting the ceasefire offers.

          • @Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I would argue that one side is fighting to achieve peace

            Hilarious. Which side is that?

            (The second part I won’t argue. The inevitable annexation is deplorable.)

            • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -35 months ago

              Hamas is has laid out a very clear and peace plan and has even agreed to a 2 state solution.

              Objectively looking at the situation one cannot say that there are two sides which do not want peace.

              Only one side does not want peace, and that is israel.

                • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -25 months ago

                  Israel said they will not stop the Genocide nor release the Palestinian hostages if Hamas releases their hostages. So not sure what you are talking about.