• @cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -6
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Reads like NIMBY propaganda. “Oh no muh construction dust.” Bitch you live in a desert…

    • @apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      377 months ago

      Put solar panels in parking lots and on buildings, where the humans live, not in fragile ecosystems. Deserts aren’t bereft of life, they are filled with some of the most resilient and charismatic flora and fauna known. Joshua trees and the Mojave have it bad enough already.

        • @MintyFresh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I want the term “parking desert” to take hold in place of parking lot. I hate most aspects of automobiles. The amount land we pave over for storage is just tragic and rude.

          We should build solar farms over our parking deserts to reduce human footprint.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            I largely agree. I think we should have car-free city centers (delivery truck and transit only) with parking garages at the edges near transit hubs. But instead of that, we subsidize driving and encourage a car-centric society.

        • @dirthawker0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67 months ago

          Kaiser, which is a major hmo here in California, has been putting solar panel parking shade in their lots. The community college in my town has it too. I can’t think of any downsides to them other than the installation cost. Everyone likes shade from sun and rain, and free electricity.

    • Hello_there
      link
      fedilink
      97 months ago

      Yes. Joshua trees and desert tortoises live in a desert. That’s the point.

    • CrimeDadOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      There’s more to NIMBYism than saying “not in my back yard” in opposition to any development for any reason. A position isn’t meaningfully NIMBY unless it is in opposition to an arguably good development for bad reasons. For example, it is NIMBYism to oppose the construction of affordable housing because you don’t want to attract poor minorities to your neighborhood. In this case, a PV solar power plant might arguably be a good thing, but the reasons for opposing it, including the destruction of a rare ecosystem and a specific type of dangerous construction pollution, are more than fair.