• @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    47 months ago

    , but might cause some of your potential voters to stay home even if they don’t vote Rep.

    And it makes a lot more sense to get those people off their butts and vote then it does to change 75 years of US policy quickly.

    We still have an embargo with Cuba, and the Cold War ended decades ago.

    If people think they are too moral to vote for biden, tell them to look up the former slaves and women who were working for candidates back when they weren’t allowed to vote. None of the people they backed could promise to change things, but they knew slight progress was better than none at all.

    • @notabot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      Oh I absolutely agree that making sure people actually vote is important, and it’s something a parties supporters can do. You can bet that Republican voters will be pushing each other, and Dems need to be just as dedicated. The thing is, that’s a whole lot easier when your candidate is saying and doing things you agree with, and not doing stuff you abhor. That’s the nit the party and candidate have control over and should be tuning. It wouldn’t be easy to make big changes, but even more moderate changes would be helpful. Biden seems to finally be changing his tune on Isreal a bit at the moment, the question is whether he’s irreconcilably alienated too many voters already, or if he can win them back.

      Expecting people to vote for Biden despite disliking his policies because the alternative is worse is logical, but might, I fear, be excessivly idealistic. The more Biden and the Dems listen to their base the easier this will be.

      • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        New York Mayor Ed Koch had a great line.

        “If you agree with me 51%, vote for me. If you agree with me 100%, see a psychiatrist.”