@jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agoWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1475arrow-down1external-linkWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.com@jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square25fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareToes♀linkfedilinkEnglish41•6 months agoAnything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
minus-squareZeppolinkfedilinkEnglish37•6 months agoIt doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
minus-square@jet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglish13•6 months agoAnything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
minus-squareNullPointerlinkfedilinkEnglish15•6 months agoI’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
minus-square@jet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglish14•6 months agoAs long as it’s your choice, sure. But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.
Anything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
It doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
Anything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
I’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
As long as it’s your choice, sure.
But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.