• @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    556 months ago

    Nearly 11,000 Israelis visited Maldives last year, which was 0.6% of the total tourist arrivals.

    Very nice. It’s not just a symbolic boycot

    • Mike D.
      link
      fedilink
      English
      286 months ago

      A symbolic boycott is important. They still picked a side in this mess.

      • DMBFFF
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -66 months ago

        “Go back to Israel, draft-dodger. Murder more Gazans. Allāh be praised.”

      • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        06 months ago

        As the Maldives is a tourist resort 0.6% of the most major income is pretty big

        https://www.budgetyourtrip.com/maldives

        You should plan to spend around** $299 (MVR4,623) per day on your vacation in the Maldives.** This is the average daily price based on the expenses of other visitors

        Even assuming that every tourist stays one single day that would be 3.3 million dollars. And I’d wager most tourists stay longer than that

        • Todd Bonzalez
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          So, admittedly, $3.3 Million is low-balling it, and that the real figure is probably something like $20 Million, assuming that each tourist stays ~1 week and spends $299/day as you have quoted.

          But these numbers don’t mean anything in a vacuum. More context is needed to understand the actual impact of this decision.

          The Maldives have a GDP of $6.55 Billion. Assuming that this costs them $20 Million in tourism revenue, that’s only a 0.3% drop in GDP. The annual fluctuation in GDP is ±9%. The impact of banning Israeli tourists is less than a rounding error on the Economy of the Maldives.

          • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -16 months ago

            An entire economy is made up of many parts. 0.3% doesn’t sound like much but with big numbers it adds up.

            A sacrifice of 20 million dollars is more than just symbolism.

            • Todd Bonzalez
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              The problem here is that $20 million isn’t a “big number” compared to $6.55 Billion.

              Believe whatever you want, I can’t stop you, but you are objectively wrong.

              • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                06 months ago

                Let’s pretend the Maldives is America. Would you say that America losing 0.3% of its entire GDP over a boycott is "symbolic?