Donald Trump has been found guilty of using a criminal hush-money scheme to influence the outcome of the 2016 election.

The verdict came after a jury deliberated for less than twelve hours in the unprecedented first criminal trial against a US president. It marks a perilous political moment for Trump, the presumptive nominee for the Republican nomination, whose poll numbers have remained unchanged throughout the trial but could tank at any moment.

  • @nailingjello@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    504 months ago

    From CNN:

    Judge Juan Merchan sets a sentencing hearing for July 11 at 10 a.m. ET

    Seems like a long delay, is that typical in a high profile case like this?

      • bbbbbbbbbbb
        link
        fedilink
        224 months ago

        Its weird that thats going on again, what happened to the indefinite suspension?

        • Lemminary
          link
          fedilink
          104 months ago

          Well, you see, he’s got money and a few like-minded friends…

          • Drusas
            link
            fedilink
            64 months ago

            He has make believe money in the stock market and properties he doesn’t want to sell but apparently no cash.

            • @azimir@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              74 months ago

              He did just sell a jet for $10mil+ to raise money to pay legal fees. It turning out that the sale has some possibly illegal parts so now it’s turning into the latest criming on his docket to deal with, though.

              • Lemminary
                link
                fedilink
                44 months ago

                Holy shit. It’s crime all the way down with this guy, isn’t it.

                • Drusas
                  link
                  fedilink
                  24 months ago

                  Always was. Anyone who lived in the New York/New Jersey area in the 80s or 90s remembers.

    • Willie
      link
      fedilink
      324 months ago

      They requested the delay to July, since he is in court for another case in another area. I suppose it was reasonable to grant it. It’d be unfair for someone to not get their right to a trial, even if they were found guilty of a crime in another area.

      It’d make more sense to keep him in custody in the meantime though. I mean, that’s what they do for normal people. Right?