@realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 6 months agoNon-binarylemmy.worldimagemessage-square210fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down1107
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageNon-binarylemmy.world@realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 6 months agomessage-square210fedilink
minus-square@stanleytweedle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish64•6 months agoFeel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
minus-squarepooberbee (any)linkfedilink38•6 months agoDoes the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
minus-square@gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink-2•6 months agoA bit can have two states: true or false. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).
Feel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
Does the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
No, it’s only Russell’s question.
A bit can have two states:
trueorfalse. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).