• YAMAPIKARIYA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      I don’t think so. They are using AI from a 3rd party. If they train their own specialized version, things will be better.

      • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 months ago

        Here is a better idea: have some academic integrity and actually do the work instead of using incompetent machine learning to flood the industry with inaccurate trash papers whose only real impact is getting in the way of real research.

        • YAMAPIKARIYA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          There is nothing wrong with using AI to proofread a paper. It’s just a grammar checker but better.

          • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            47 months ago

            You can literally use tools to check grammar perfectly without using AI. What the LLM AI does is it predict what word comes next in a sequence, and if the AI is wrong as it often is then you’ve just attempted to publish a paper with halucinations wasting the time and effort of so many people because you’re greedy and lazy.

            • YAMAPIKARIYA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              AI does better at checking for grammar and clarity of message. It’s just a fact. I’ve made comparisons myself using a grammar checker on an essay vs AI and AI corrected it and made it much better.

              • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -37 months ago

                AI doesn’t do anything better than a human being. Human Beings are the training data, an AI that mimics it 98% is still less accurate than the humans. If you suck so much at writing papers then you’re just below average as a human being who writes papers and using tools will never remedy that without introspection and a desire to improve.

                • YAMAPIKARIYA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  27 months ago

                  You said that “you can literally use tools to check grammar perfectly” I’ve responded to that claim. No mention of humans. You seem to be projecting

          • @BearGun@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Proofreading involves more than just checking grammar, and AIs aren’t perfect. I would never put my name on something to get published publicly like this without reading it through at least once myself.

            • YAMAPIKARIYA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              47 months ago

              I entirely agree. You should read through something you’ll publish.

      • @alehc@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        That’s not necessarily true. General-purpose 3rd party models (chatgpt, llama3-70b, etc) perform surprisingly good in very specific tasks. While training or finetuning your specialized model should indeed give you better results, the crazy amount of computational resources and specialized manpower needed to accomplish it makes it unfeasible and unpractical in many applications. If you can get away with an occational “as an AI model…”, you are better off using existing models.