Russia amps up nuclear threat.

  • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -16 months ago

    Sending a fissile bullet into a fissile shell to activate a hydrogen payload is certainly a delicate mechanism, but to take so much as a 1% chance of detonating a nuclear warhead that otherwise wouldn’t have gone off, escalating nuclear war across the entire earth, is a bad idea and you will never convince me otherwise.

    • @sugartits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      Its not 1%.

      It’s not even 0.01%

      You could try it once a second for the rest of your life, and it still wouldn’t go off.

      You’d just damage it at the most. Maybe trigger a safety system which will need to be reset before it can be armed again.

      Nobody is saying it’s a good idea, it’s just a complete non issue.

        • @sugartits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          Oh, okay then. Yeah sure, I made it up. It’s a 90% chance and we’ve just been exceptionally lucky.

          • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -36 months ago

            I like to believe that throughout the last century the number of morons shooting any form of projectile at armed nuclear warheads was minimal, but you’re certainly making that harder to believe.

            • @sugartits@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              Well, sure, but it doesn’t change the facts on the ground that you can shoot whatever you like at a nuke and it’s exceptionally unlikely to explode.

              But if you just want to scream “bullshit” for no reason in the face of the facts then I guess there isn’t much point in continuing. Not sure why you just choose to believe whatever you want, but I guess I can’t stop you.