@Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agoScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.netexternal-linkmessage-square186fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down173
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1external-linkScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.net@Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square186fedilink
minus-square@Suavevillain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish175•edit-26 months agoMost of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.
minus-square@Blackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish85•6 months agoNo, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it. When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
minus-square@kibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish13•edit-26 months agoThat’s pretty much the whole point. Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people. Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoAnd traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.
Most of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.
No, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it.
When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
That’s pretty much the whole point.
Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people.
Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
And traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.
Not in this case.