• @NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 month ago

    I’ve always interpreted it as which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?

    I agree. And this boils down to how you define ‘chicken egg’. If the definition is “egg laid by a chicken”, then the chicken had to have come first. If it’s “egg that hatches a chick” (which will grow into a chicken), then the egg must have come first. But this ignores the pretty huge problem of picking a precise point on the evolutionary timeline where a non-chicken gave birth to a chicken. There isn’t going to be such a clearly-defined point.

    • Dharma Curious
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Yeah, but it’s at least an interesting pointless unsolvable conundrum, whereas the other interpretations aren’t even interesting. Lol.