@ylai@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish • 7 months agoOpen Source Initiative tries to define Open Source AIwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1142arrow-down13cross-posted to: fosai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1139arrow-down1external-linkOpen Source Initiative tries to define Open Source AIwww.theregister.com@ylai@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish • 7 months agomessage-square30fedilinkcross-posted to: fosai@lemmy.world
minus-square@vrighter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink2•7 months agoyou released it under a non open source license. So very clearly: no it is not
minus-square@delirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilink8•7 months agoWut. That license is literally compatible with the GPL
minus-square@leopold@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish7•7 months agoCC BY-SA is considered open source. CC BY-NC is not.
you released it under a non open source license. So very clearly: no it is not
Wut. That license is literally compatible with the GPL
CC BY-SA is considered open source. CC BY-NC is not.