• Doofus Magoo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      States can establish religions. Federal government can’t.

      Over the last 150 years, the Supreme Court has pretty consistently found that the Bill of Rights applies to state as well as federal government: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_Rights

      See especially https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everson_v._Board_of_Education:

      Everson v. Board of Education … was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that applied the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to state law.

      • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -136 months ago

        Mandatory “one nation under god” pledge in school classes disagrees that religion cannot be established.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            106 months ago

            Don’t bother. Every time you point out they say something that isn’t true, they change the subject.

          • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -12
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            There are so many cases of promoting Christianity by the US government, a few cherrypicked cases of “trouble” doesn’t disprove any of this.

            • “As a matter of historical tradition, the words ‘under God’ can no more be expunged from the national consciousness than the words ‘In God We Trust’ from every coin in the land, than the words ‘so help me God’ from every presidential oath since 1789, or than the prayer that has opened every congressional session of legislative business since 1787.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance#Legal_challenges

            Also, the US print religious indoctrination on their currency: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust

            • @Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              76 months ago

              I’m not arguing for religion to be in school. I’m just saying what’s there is already bad enough without making stuff up.

        • @undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          Its also said “with liberty and justice for all” during a time where people kept literal slaves, without a hint of irony.

          The wording far too inconsistent and vague to be taken as literally as you’re attempting to take them.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      176 months ago

      That’s not how it works. State law can’t supersede federal law.

      • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -136 months ago

        State law can’t supersede federal law.

        And Congress cannot pass laws on that. Constitution says so.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          106 months ago

          That is an extremely narrow view of the First Amendment that goes against over two centuries of judicial precedent. Only a Clarence Thomas-level originalist would make such an argument.

          • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -136 months ago

            That is an extremely narrow view of the First Amendment that goes against over two centuries of judicial precedent.

            Mandatory “one nation under god” pledge in school classes proves that establishing religion in the US is fine.