A federal judge in Fort Worth, Texas, on Friday blocked a new Biden administration rule that would prohibit credit card companies from charging customers late fees higher than $8.

US District Judge Mark T. Pittman, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, granted a preliminary injunction to several business and banking organizations that allege the new rule violates several federal statutes.

These organizations, led by the right-leaning US Chamber of Commerce, sued the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau after the rule was finalized in March. The rule, which was set to go into effect Tuesday, would save consumers about $10 billion per year by cutting fees from an average of $32, the CFPB estimated.

      • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m not happy with centrism. The term is progressive for a reason. If you abandon all progress short of the goal, you’re not progressing. That just leads to party division, disenfranchisement, and Republican regression. Liberal policies of today were the progressive legislation of the past.

        • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -156 months ago

          I’m not happy with centrism. The term is progressive for a reason. If you abandon all progress short of the goal, you’re not progressing. That just leads to party division, disenfranchisement, and Republican regression.

          Stop trying to redefine “progressive” to mean “slow walking progress.”

          • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            12
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The government is slow, not the ideals. What you fail to understand is that liberal policies that you take for granted today were the progressive policies of the past. You’ll never reach the goal if you discredit and discard everything that comes up short.

            Your willful ignorance to recognize that half the nation is in opposition of liberal and progressive ideals is what leads you to point the finger at those who understand that compromise is necessary when Democrats don’t have full control of the government.

            If Democrats could successfully maintain presidential and congressional majority for an extended period, politicians would be forced to become more progressive to capture more of the vote. That requires unity, not division.

            • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -116 months ago

              What you don’t understand is that liberal policies that you take for granted today were the progressive policies of the past.

              I understand that progressives fought for them in the past and centrists didn’t, often fighting against them, just like today. Contentment does not produce progress. Which is why people who don’t want progress call discontent divisive.

              • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                12
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                What the successful progressives of the past understood, that you clearly don’t, is that the opposition to progressives and liberals is Republicans. They succeeded in passing progressive legislation through unity.

                Find me a piece of successful legislation passed exclusively by progressive members of Congress. I’ll wait.

                • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -146 months ago

                  the opposition to progressives and liberals is Republicans.

                  That dynamic has changed. The opposition to progressives is liberals and Republicans.

                  • Why don’t you tell us who Bernie supported and voted for for president the last few cycles, and then tell us why you think you’re smarter than him.