Europeans — especially Germans — are increasingly keen on curbing immigration and are less focused on climate change, according to a study by a Danish-based think tank.

Europe has seen a sharp rise in the share of people who say that reducing immigration should be a top government priority, according to a study published Wednesday. Germany is topping the list.

At the same time, there was less desire to prioritize fighting climate change in the same countries, according to the survey commissioned by the Denmark-based Alliance of Democracies Foundation think tank.

Nearly half of German respondents put focus on migration

Since 2022, an increasing number of Europeans say their government should prioritize “reducing immigration,” rising from just under 20% to a quarter.

Meanwhile, concern about climate change was on the slide across the continent.

“In 2024, for the first time, reducing immigration is a greater priority for most Europeans than fighting climate change,” the report said.

Nowhere is this reversal more striking than in Germany, which now leads the world with the highest share of people who want their government to focus on reducing immigration — topping all other priorities — and now nearly twice as high as fighting climate change,” the report read.

  • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -17 months ago

    Yes, I’m familiar with what you’re talking about about. We’ve had similar backlashes even within the US before. The thing is, it’s something people can, have, and do figure out without arresting anyone. People are smart and generally want to do what they believe to be the right thing and have a peaceful life, that’s broadly true across our species.

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      You’re the only one around here talking about arresting people. Maybe you share – culturally – more in common with some people that you dislike than you realise or you wouldn’t be preoccupied like that.

      • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        As I said elsewhere, I’m speaking as a citizen of a country who has repeatedly and severely fucked up, and continues to do so, in the hopes that I might save someone else the embarrassment of becoming a citizen of such a country. To wit, I must ask how you plan on enforcing immigration controls without law enforcement.

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          To wit, I must ask how you plan on enforcing immigration controls without law enforcement.

          Oh no. You weren’t talking about border guards, you were talking about arresting people for having brown skin, or speaking different languages, for the “crime” of “eroding the culture”.

          Heck I erode Italy’s culture every time I’m there simply by being convinced that pineapple on pizza is a perfectly valid thing to do. So far, none of them ever suggested arresting me.

          • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            Saying “I want cops but the difference is that this time they’re the good guys and don’t hurt anyone” doesn’t really move the needle for me. You can’t use the power of the state to use its force on people only it’s totally rainbows and sunshine this time.

            • @barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              Saying […]

              Who said that? Who, here, aside from you, is talking about cops? Are those cops here in the room with us right now?

              • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                You, unless you want the law to enforce itself via magic. So, again, how are you enforcing these immigration rules without cops? Oh, wait, by calling cops “guards”? Call them the rainbow patrol for all I care, a cop by any other name is still a cop.

                • @barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  27 months ago

                  We do have borders, yes. We have an asylum process, we have an immigration process, we have a process for working permits, we have a naturalisation process, it’s all very well regulated and yes you can get through all of that without ever coming into contact with anyone in a uniform, short of a border guard.

                  What we don’t, and won’t, have is what you propose, and that is arresting American tourists on the subway for loudly speaking English. Or making it more difficult to open a Nigerian restaurant than a German one. That’s all your imagination, you’ve been told so multiple times by multiple people, and you still don’t seem to be able to understand it.

                  • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    07 months ago

                    I want to be clear: I couldn’t give a crap about whether Americans get arrested. Nationalities are a construct made up by tyrants; people are people, and they deserve to not come to harm regardless of where they happened to be born.

                    So, it sounds like you’re proposing, what, no changes? What exactly is it, then, that people want to in order to deal with immigration, if not more cops and more aggressive laws?