• @credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -286 months ago

    To that end, this means we would need to lower standards, use some forced labor, and increase taxes to increase subsidies in order to compete.

    Republicans would shoot down the subsidies.

    • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      676 months ago

      No it literally wouldn’t. It’s absolutely possible to produce smaller lightweight vehicles with the exact same standards. But unfortunately we’ve all been pushed towards larger vehicles. Simply because they make more money on them.

      • @ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        446 months ago

        The push towards large vehicles was due to the fact that they used a truck chassis, and were exempt from safety and emissions requirements of a “car”

      • @andrewth09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 months ago

        Unfortunately producing a smaller affordable car for the average person would fall under “lower standards” 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

      • Amoxtli
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -226 months ago

        It doesn’t matter what size car Americans build, they simply can’t compete. Larger vehicles are a cultural preference and fits the American environment.

        • @GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          106 months ago

          If this was true, the Chinese EVs could be allowed in and no one would buy them. I personally want a smaller car that can comfortably seat 5 and has additional safety and comfort features (backup cameras, lane assist, heat pump climate control, etc.). This could easily be done with a sedan, hatchback, or station wagon. The only cars that have these features that I know of are SUVs.

          • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Not exactly true when they’re selling them for $10k-$15k. The Bolt is comparable to a Chinese EV and they only sell around 2k per month while something like the Model 3 sells 50k per month.

            If you lowered the price of the Bolt to the price of a 10 year old used Camry, I’m sure it would sell a lot better but this is an artificial price that completely distorts the market and puts a lot of people out of work for what amounts to a temporary savings. This is the whole point of tariffs. They level the playing field for everyone.

            • @GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              Where I live, the base model of the Chevy Bolt is $41k, and doesn’t have heat pump climate control (or isn’t talking about it). It also doesn’t look like it would seat 5 comfortably. Now, even without the spectre of financially supporting Elon’s antics, I don’t see a lot of reason to pay another $10k for a reasonably similar car. People are weird. 🤷‍♂️

              • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                Often what people say they want and what they actually spend their money on are not even in the same ballpark. This reminds me of all the guys from /r/Cars who’d say they dream of some stripped down vehicle with crank windows and no features but when manufacturers make them, nobody actually buys them.

        • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          I think they’re a preference of the motor industry who want you to buy more expensive cars.

    • @redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      376 months ago

      Just producing EV versions of Honda Fit or Ford Fiesta like what the Chinese EV makers do is enough. Instead, they keep producing EVs with luxury features (and high price tags) then surprised people won’t buy them without subsidy.

        • @redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          The Bolt isn’t cheap though (almost 2x of Honda Fit price), and wasn’t produced in sufficient quantity. The Chinese EV companies are somehow able to produce entry level EV models with minimal features at a price cheaper than Honda Fit and they’re selling like hot cakes both domestically and in neighboring Asian countries.

          • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            With the $7500 credit, the Bolt is the same price or slightly cheaper than the Fit when you account for inflation.

            China is able to sell these vehicles for this cheap because the government is giving these companies cash to sell them at these artificially low prices. That’s the whole point of this discussion and the proposed tariffs as none of the competition will be receiving subsidies at these levels in order to compete. China is also known for lax worker protections which helps to drive the costs down further at the expense of the workforce and is not something they’ll be able to do if they manufacture here.

            • @redcalcium@lemmy.institute
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Are they still doing the EV credit thing?

              Subsidy definitely helps, but those Chinese car manufacturers are able to squeeze their parts suppliers hard, so they’re able to sell their cars cheaper even without subsidy. For example, their gasoline cars are about half the price of comparable Japanese models, even with engines sourced from GM/Ford.