• @IcePee@lemmy.beru.co
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    A few questions:

    • How many respondents where there?
    • What was the national break down?
    • How were the respondents selected? Was it random?
    • Were the questions phased universally across nations?

    Without these questions answered, it’s hard to make out what to think about this statistic.

    As the saying goes: “lies, damned lies, and statistics”.

    As it is, It would have been more useful if they allowed respondents a selection of choices. Such as: Don’t Know/Care, Neutral, About Right and Not Enough.

    Maybe a meta study would have made a better subject for an article.