• originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      i think docker allows for this configuration. i use a gluetun container for the network definition of the torrent container to prevent leaking. the torrent container knows of no other network than the vpn container.

    • @the_third@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      There’s readily available docker containers for it but I wanted to build it by hand. Well, more or less, Extremely hacky but it works, so fine for me.

      I started out with cheating and used this wrapper around wg-quick that gives us a persistent network namespace with the tunnel interface in it:

      https://github.com/dadevel/wg-netns

      cat /etc/systemd/system/wg-qbittorrent.service
      [Unit]
      Description=WireGuard Network Namespace for qBittorrent
      Wants=network-online.target nss-lookup.target
      After=network-online.target nss-lookup.target
      
      [Service]
      Type=oneshot
      Environment=WG_ENDPOINT_RESOLUTION_RETRIES=infinity
      Environment=WG_VERBOSE=1
      ExecStart=/opt/wg-netns/bin/wg-netns up /etc/wireguard/wgconfig.yaml
      ExecStop=/opt/wg-netns/bin/wg-netns down /etc/wireguard/wgconfig.yaml
      RemainAfterExit=yes
      
      WorkingDirectory=%E/wireguard
      ConfigurationDirectory=wireguard
      ConfigurationDirectoryMode=0700
      
      CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_NET_ADMIN CAP_SYS_ADMIN
      LimitNOFILE=4096
      LimitNPROC=512
      LockPersonality=true
      MemoryDenyWriteExecute=true
      NoNewPrivileges=true
      ProtectClock=true
      ProtectHostname=true
      RemoveIPC=true
      RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_INET AF_INET6 AF_NETLINK
      RestrictNamespaces=mnt net
      RestrictRealtime=true
      RestrictSUIDSGID=true
      SystemCallArchitectures=native
      
      [Install]
      WantedBy=multi-user.target
      

      Then I built a static binary of qbittorrent using this really neat docker image: https://github.com/userdocs/qbittorrent-nox-static

      …and stuffed the result into a systemd service that runs it in the namespace wg-netns provides:

      cat /etc/systemd/system/qbittorrent-nox.service 
      
      [Unit]
      Description=qBittorrent-nox service
      Wants=network-online.target wg-qbittorrent.service 
      After=local-fs.target network-online.target nss-lookup.target wg-qbittorrent.service 
      
      [Service]
      Type=simple
      PrivateTmp=false
      #User=qbittorrent
      ExecStart=/usr/sbin/ip netns exec ns-qbittorrent sudo -u qbittorrent /opt/qbittorrent/qbittorrent-nox
      TimeoutStopSec=1800
      RestartSec=15
      RestartMaxDelaySec=600
      RestartSteps=10
      Restart=always
      
      [Install]
      WantedBy=multi-user.target
      
      

      To get the webui out of that I stuck two instances of socat together at the stdout and from there it depends on whatever you want to use as a reverse proxy on the host - or you bind to a network interface if you trust the network:

      cat /etc/systemd/system/qbittorrent-webui.service 
      [Unit]
      Description=qBittorrent-nox webui forwarding into its namespace
      Wants=network-online.target wg-qbittorrent.service 
      After=local-fs.target network-online.target nss-lookup.target wg-qbittorrent.service 
      
      [Service]
      Type=simple
      PrivateTmp=false
      ExecStart=/opt/qbittorrent/forward-webinterface.sh
      TimeoutStopSec=1800
      Restart=always
      RestartSec=10
      
      [Install]
      WantedBy=multi-user.target
      
      cat /opt/qbittorrent/forward-webinterface.sh
      #!/bin/sh
      set -eu
      
      exec socat tcp6-listen:"8080",reuseaddr,fork,range=[::1]/128 "exec:ip netns exec ns-qbittorrent socat stdio 'tcp-connect:127.0.0.1:8080',nofork"
      
      

      Works, is reboot safe, stopped caring about beauty at that point.

      • @xabadak
        link
        English
        17 months ago

        Do you know how to make it so all the host’s traffic is sent through the VPN namespace? I couldn’t figure out how to do this so I ended up just writing my own firewall. Network namespaces seems like a better solution.

        • @the_third@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          I haven’t found the time to research an answer for you, sorry. The way I’d go is: create a veth of your physical uplink and stuff it into its own namespace with dhcp client and wg userspace tools. Do not configure the original interface in your initial namespace. Use the approach wg-netns uses to spawn the tunnel interface in initial network ns. Done.

          • @xabadak
            link
            English
            17 months ago

            No worries, and thanks for providing a response nonetheless. I’ll look into your suggestion when I have the time. The official Wireguard website also had some guide on network namespaces here but afaik it didn’t explain how to set it up persistently