• HeartyBeast
    link
    fedilink
    47 months ago

    Were Nazis allowed to deliberately ‘run rampant’ on Twitter pre-Elon? That’s a hot take.

    Musk’s buying Twitter had nothing to do with it being ‘monetised’ as far as I see. Musk just offered such a stupidly large amount that the board had to say ‘OK, sure.’

    • Corgana
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They absolutely were, without question. That said, there’s nothing this guy can do to make that happen on Mastodon instances he doesn’t own.

      • HeartyBeast
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        Just a quick reminder that Twitter was banning 10s of thousands of accounts of extremists that breached its terms of service, including a certain ex president of the US. It was imperfect, but ‘running rampant’ is a stretch

        • The Cuuuuube
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          How many times did Trump show his true colors before getting banned? Twitter’s moderation policies were better pre-Musk but they were far FAR from acceptable.

        • Corgana
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It seems like we agree on the facts, and I certainly won’t disagree that it’s worse now, but I would characterize Twitter’s (pre-Musk) response to extremism as “measured, lacking and lethargic”, before I would use “imperfect”, which still implies “pretty good” and from my perceptive it was not good enough to make me want to use it. I think maybe we just have a different tolerance for hate speech.