Greg Rutkowski, a digital artist known for his surreal style, opposes AI art but his name and style have been frequently used by AI art generators without his consent. In response, Stable Diffusion removed his work from their dataset in version 2.0. However, the community has now created a tool to emulate Rutkowski’s style against his wishes using a LoRA model. While some argue this is unethical, others justify it since Rutkowski’s art has already been widely used in Stable Diffusion 1.5. The debate highlights the blurry line between innovation and infringement in the emerging field of AI art.

  • @ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think people forget the reality when they take their supposedly brave and oh so altruistic stance of “there should be no copyright”.

    When people already know they won’t even have a small chance of getting paid for the art they create, we will run out of artists.

    Because most can not afford to learn and practice that craft without getting any form of payment. It will become a very rare hobby of a few decadent rich people who can afford to learn something like illustration in their free time.

    • Harrison [He/Him]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Art is a part of the human condition. Whether or not it can be commercialised, it will endure as a past-time, just not as a vocation.