Brazil, Germany, Spain and South Africa sign motion for fairer tax system to deliver £250bn a year extra to fight poverty and climate crisis

The world’s 3,000 billionaires should pay a minimum 2% tax on their fast-growing wealth to raise £250bn a year for the global fight against poverty, inequality and global heating, ministers from four leading economies have suggested.

In a sign of growing international support for a levy on the super-rich, Brazil, Germany, South Africa and Spain say a 2% tax would reduce inequality and raise much-needed public funds after the economic shocks of the pandemic, the climate crisis and military conflicts in Europe and the Middle East.

They are calling for more countries to join their campaign, saying the annual sum raised would be enough to cover the estimated cost of damage caused by all of last year’s extreme weather events.

“It is time that the international community gets serious about tackling inequality and financing global public goods,” the ministers say in a Guardian comment piece.

  • SteefLem
    link
    fedilink
    English
    40
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    2% what the…. My income above 50k is taxed 48% i think. Wtf 2%

    Edit: yes i know the difference, but still…

    • @Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      278 months ago

      Wealth tax is different from income tax. Once you’ve received your income it becomes wealth, and it is not taxed unless you use it. Wealth tax would mean that your money in the bank is taxed periodically.

      • @nac82@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Which is clearly necessary, and companies know it.

        Open any MMO built and organized around a player economy (designed by a for-profit corporation) and you will see they know that individual wealth can upset the balance of the game.

        They set maximum currency values, or they charge you periodic taxes for existing in the server.

        When people are being honest about wealth, we all know the concentration of wealth in the extreme fucks up the system for everybody.

        And video game systems do not even have a scarcity problem like the real world.

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      188 months ago

      That’s your income not your net worth, 2% of your net worth would be taking the value of all your cash + stocks/investments/businesses + assets like cars/homes/land/collectibles/jewelry/etc and taxing 2% of that value.

      Your income shouldn’t be your net worth unless you’re honestly spending every dime of every check

        • JJROKCZ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Not super relevant to the convo, everyone pays taxes based on income, the proposal is to make rich people ALSO pay on net worth, not all people. For most people the effort of doing a net worth assessment isn’t worth the tax income

          • @Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            Yeah I know, IMO hoarding wealth is just bad for the system we agree on (using paper slips and numbers in computers to exchange goods and services). It just gives power to the few, without the possibility to overturn them as we might in an election.

    • @orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 months ago

      ah, but imagine if you have 128Billion dollars, more than the GDP of many countries