Whether you’re really passionate about RPC, MQTT, Matrix or wayland, tell us more about the protocols or open standards you have strong opinions on!

  • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    88 months ago

    Because SecOps still thinks NAT is security, and NetOps is decidedly against carrying around that stupid tradition.

    • @fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      You can even Nat still if you want too lol

      That said have you looked at securing ipv6 networks?It can be a lot of new paridgms that need to be secured.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      bruh you could just use dyndns on ipv6 and call it a day, even more secure than ipv4 with NAT. lmao.