Or at the very least less common attachment because they grew up outside of a monoculture.

  • @TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    138 months ago

    Since 2004, we got smartphones which replaced a huge chunk of technology, internet has become far faster and more accessible leading to streaming services like Netflix and freelance video platforms like YouTube exploding, far fewer people having cable TV, kids growing up with online video rather than TV, social media went from simple platforms meant for communication with friends and family to behemoths meant to capture as much of your attention as possible, misinformation has become more trustworthy to many than traditional news, public school classrooms gained access to technology like Duolingo as learning aids, physical media has been phased out in basically all homes except those with video game consoles, software purchases have been replaced with subscriptions, and now we have programs that can create realistic-looking images and videos, human-like passages, and real-sounding speech.

    Saying that none of that is as groundbreaking as the Internet is kinda like saying the Internet wasn’t as groundbreaking as electricity. Just because the effects are subtle doesn’t make it any less groundbreaking.

    • @entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I agree with the vast majority of your comment, but this irked me a little:

      Just because the effects are subtle doesn’t make it any less groundbreaking.

      Here’s the definition of the word groundbreaking, per the Cambridge Dictionary:

      If something is groundbreaking, it is very new and a big change from other things of its type

      Much of the changes you describe are big improvements/changes that happened gradually over time (so, not “very new”). I would describe those as iterative improvements, not groundbreaking besides the notable exception of the AI explosion of the past 3-4 years.