• @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      119 months ago

      I would argue that QA saves you money. In that, it detects faulty products and in doing so limit liability.

        • @Malfeasant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The problem is QA vs QC. Quality control means you actually have to do stuff. Quality assurance just means “I assure you, the quality is good ;)”

      • gimpchrist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 months ago

        If you don’t have a QA you run the risk of having to rebuild the entire bar from scratch

      • @XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        QC detects problems. QA predicts, mitigates, and resolves problems. QA is the first to go when it’s cheaper to scrap problems rather than make perfect product. QC goes when companies can outsource it to supplier-reported inspections and then leave it to the customer to act as final inspection. The Amazon method that everyone has to follow if they want to stay competitive