I swear, every time most of the time I see someone being particularly rude, ignorant, and inappropriate on a post (usually political in origin, or they swing it to being political) I click on their profile and see it has been created that same day.

They are only there to sow discord. Only to piss people off. Idk if we can just report them (for what?) but I’d like to try exposing them before responding and interacting…

I am guilty of gobbling up the bait. I’ve started looking at profiles of people that piss me off exceptionally and noticed they’re burner bot loser accounts.

I guess i just want to say I’ve noticed it!

  • @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    517 months ago

    The whole of Lemmy is, in general, severely under-moderated.

    Part of it is personnel (being a moderator is a crappy job and we don’t have the people to do it) but it’s also ideological. A lot of people here believe that allowing disruptive speech is better than suppressing expression.

    That’s a choice and we live with the consequences.

    • @SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      That’s a choice and we live with the consequences.

      I mean, let’s be clear: The choice lies with the users. If users want to allow disruptive speech (or what’s worse), they can go to the instances/communities that allow that kind of speech. If not, they can go to other instances/communities that have stricter moderation.

      You don’t have to personally live with it - go somewhere else if you don’t like where you are right now.

      • @blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        This place is like a black mirror episode. “It’s okay, just block the Nazis and it’s like they’re not there terrorizing and indoctrinating others, bc I can’t see it”

        • Catfish [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          147 months ago

          If your instance admins haven’t defederated with the nazi instances yet you gotta talk to them my friend. You could also move to a different instance that has defederated from the nazi instances, I think most have.

        • @SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          77 months ago

          I don’t mean each user needs to block people, I mean go to instances and communities that are well-moderated.

      • @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You don’t have to personally live with it - go somewhere else if you don’t like where you are right now.

        I have been spending relatively more time on Bluesky now you mention it. They way they do block propagation is just 😘👌

          • @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I’m not super sharp about the details, but if you block someone, by default other people don’t see their replies on your stuff. There may be more features but I’m not sure.

            Anyway, it remains functional even when overrun with shitheads because not everyone needs to block everyone.

            • @SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I see.

              not everyone needs to block everyone.

              I feel like defederation is the tool for this on the Fediverse. But just to be clear, when I said “go somewhere else if you don’t like where you are right now” I didn’t mean go away from the Fediverse, I just meant another community or instance basically.

              • @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I would argue that defederation is a completely fucking brain dead way to deal with bad faith users.

                And the “fediverse” has no answers here.

                • @SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  27 months ago

                  How come? I mean if there is a concentration of bad faith users on an instance or maybe the instance attracts such types because it has no rules or directly encourages such behaviour, is it not good that other instances can choose not to interact with that instance?

                  • @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -2
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    Try being a bad faith actor for a week and see how much defederation affects you.

                    It’s just drama fuel that does nothing to improve the quality of discourse on the network because it’s trivially bypassed.

                    It only punishes users with permanent identities, that is good faith users. Trolls just move. They do it all the time anyway to evade blocks.

        • @SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          But again, you choose your mods. If you think your mods are being unreasonable, use other communities with better mods - or start your own community and become the better mod yourself.

        • @anarchost@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yea, I have gotten comments removed and banned several times from lemmy.ml for disagreeing with literal and easily disproven Russian propaganda. You don’t even need to be pro anything, just disagreeing with Russia does it.

          You think moderators remove those comments? (/s)

          Protip: by replying to a comment on many apps, you can see the content of the comment. This can be very useful.

      • @anarchost@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        07 months ago

        Anything much outside of the mods’ pro-Russian, pro-CCP, pro-Hamas narrative on /c/worldnews is frequently removed and the user banned. Pro-Western users have a strict bigotry standard applied, while anti-Western users can say anything.

        I noticed somebody who wrote “death to amerikkka” was given official mod sanction (saying that it was a country not a people group) so I made the same comment about the CCP.

        Comment removed. Banned.

        Confirmed.

        • @Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Uses the racist abbreviation used by nazis

          Gets banned for like 3 days tops

          “This is oppression. I’m being oppressed.”

          • @anarchost@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            -17 months ago

            “Racist” - learn the difference between a state and a race.

            Everybody calls the CCP the CCP. This is literally a “Nazis drink water” situation.

            Death to the CCP. Death to all other fascist groups.

            • davel [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              What coherent theory of fascism puts Nazi Germany and modern China in that same bucket? https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Fascism

              Fascism, usually understood in Marxist theory as capitalism in decay, is a counter-revolutionary reactionary movement led by finance capital, and a form of dictatorship of the bourgeoisie which emerged during periods of economic crisis in imperialist countries. The Third International described fascism as the “open, terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, and most imperialist elements of finance capital.”

              Fascism abolishes bourgeois democracy without abolishing bourgeois rule itself. […]

              Fascism usually promotes policies that favour the ever-expanding domination of capital. Its political aspect is marked by pervasive anti-communism, a profound aversion towards democracy, the justification and glorification of class society through class collaboration, and chauvinistic tendencies, namely reactionary nationalism, racism, sexism, and ableism. Fascist ideologues usually promote conspiracy theories, irrational myths and manipulative distortions of truth to gather support of their popular base.

              • @anarchost@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                -17 months ago

                Fascism abolishes bourgeois democracy without abolishing bourgeois rule itself. […]

                Look no further than the capitalist class at the top of the CCP. Its imperialist initiatives. Its reactionary treatment of Muslims, LGBT people, etc.

                Inb4 internal propaganda. Nazis say Jews got great swimming pools.

                • davel [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Inb4 internal propaganda.

                  No idea what that’s supposed to mean, but let’s go through the bog-standard Five Eyes Kool Aid you’ve presented.

                  Look no further than the capitalist class at the top of the CCP.

                  The capitalist class is not at the top of the CPC. China is a proletarian state, where the capitalist class is not in control: China’s housing minister says real estate developers must go bankrupt if necessary. Whereas the US is a bourgeois state, where the capitalist class is in control.

                  The US Federal Reserve is just the cartel of the US private banks and they also largely control the Treasury. Whereas banking in China is predominantly state owned. The Chinese state both runs these banks and has fiat monetary sovereignty, so it’s not answerable to the capitalists. A bit of a tangent/background: Why The Government Has Infinite Money

                  Its imperialist initiatives.

                  What imperialist initiatives? The US has over 750 overseas bases around the world and is installing more right now in order to further encircle China. Meanwhile China has one anti-piracy base on the coast of Djibouti. https://lemmy.ml/comment/10148422

                  Its reactionary treatment of Muslims, LGBT people, etc.

                  What reactionary treatment of Muslims? They get material support from the state just as other religions do, despite the CPC being formally atheist/agnostic. Their official position is that religions will eventually wither away on their own.

                  Or did you really mean Uyghurs? They and other ethic minorities were excepted from the One-Child policy, and in Xinjiang they have grown in numbers relative to Hans as a result.

                  In accordance with China’s affirmative action policies towards ethnic minorities, all non-Han ethnic groups were subject to different laws and were usually allowed to have two children in urban areas, and three or four in rural areas.

                  I’ve beaten the “Uyghur genocide” (“cultural” or otherwise) psyop to death already: https://lemmy.ml/comment/10145782

                  LGBT people

                  I’m not very familiar with China’s current situation on this large topic. The US isn’t exactly a shining beacon on a hill here: been to Tennessee or Florida lately? Even the distorted stories we get US Cold War II think tanks and corporate media don’t put things anywhere near fascism. The US has a whole human rights concern troll industrial complex aimed at countries it wants to regime change.

                  etc.

                  What etcetera? You know what, here are answers to some of your next questions: https://lemmy.ml/comment/9448375

        • @easyeasy@toast.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          gatt dayum dogg shut the fuck up. amerikkka is the global hegimon who bombed tens o million and razed half the globe. china is already sanctioned to shit but still gives out $$$ to poor ass countries. bruv you on a crusade for western interests lmao “anarchost”. i guess the US state department is anarchy now innit? LMFAOOOO

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -37 months ago

        Yup! I had a comment removed from lemmy.ml because I said something nice about the USA. I had another comment removed because I said something not nice about CCP.

          • @anarchost@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            According to moderators, even using the word “CCP” makes you a racist orientalist Nazi.

            If that sounds like the neolib tactic of calling all criticism of Israel (or even the Netanyahu regime) “antisemitic” that’s because it is.

            • Cowbee [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              07 months ago

              That’s not what they said, though, and that’s not what you said either. I understand wanting to make your case, but you understated what got removed and overstated the reaction, which was just a removed comment and a 1 day ban for Orientalism.

              You didn’t critique the CPC either, unless you think calling for death is critique.

              • @anarchost@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                If you stalked my comment history, then you’re being extremely selective and disingenuous, or very lazy.

                “Death to Amerikkka” is not a critique either. But it is allowed by moderators. Do you condemn that equally?

                A political party is not a race.

                Death to the CCP.

                To quote @davel@lemmy.ml : Reporter, please learn the difference between a people and a state.

                • Cowbee [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  07 months ago

                  Nah, I just checked the modlog against your name, I didn’t stalk it.

                  I didn’t say “Death to Amerikkka” is a critique, you said critiquing the CCP gets you removed, but you didn’t critique the CPC as evidenced by the modlog. I think it was more cringe than anything.

                  • @anarchost@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    27 months ago

                    So in worldnews, being cringe is bannable if it’s against the CCP but not the US.

                    I also paraphrased an upvoted comment on this subreddit that calls people who call it the CCP a racist Nazi.

                    And you don’t think orientalism (the real kind) is also racist? That’s a weird nitpick you tried to employ.

    • @Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      A lot of people here believe that allowing disruptive speech is better than suppressing expression.

      Yep! Imo it’s the only way to beat trolls. If you suppress it, your still giving it attention and publicity. Your also playing into their game that they will claim you sensor truth.

      Imo if you tell someone: “yeah, come to lemmy, voice your opinion. We won’t ban you but if we mostly disagree and ignore, clearly your idea was not with its salt”.