Mexico's president says he won't fight drug cartels on US orders, calls it a 'Mexico First' policy
apnews.com
Mexico’s president says he won’t fight drug cartels on U.S. orders, in the clearest explanation yet of his refusal to confront the gangs.
  • LemminaryEnglish
    5•8 months ago

    Lmfao so your tactic is just to ask for sources? Funny that you don’t provide your own for what he said. Do that and we’re in business. Lead by example.

    Meanwhile, chew on US’s secrets being disclosed to unauthorized people. It’s been all over the news, I’m sure you’re aware. If not, keep licking those boots. Ignorance is bliss, after all.

    • NeuromancerEnglish
      -5•8 months ago

      I didn’t ask for a source. Your opinion is fine. You made a claim then get all weird to back it up. I personally think Trump did a good job as president.

      If you think he did a bad job as president. Let’s hear it.

          • LemminaryEnglish
            5•8 months ago

            What a weird excuse indeed.

            Sorry, run it through NewPipe or some shit, idgaf. You’ve got hands and I gave what was asked. I’m not here to spoonfeed anybody.

              • LemminaryEnglish
                6•8 months ago

                That’s nice. You were given alternative options and you have hands. Run it through a video-to-text converter if you must. It’s a minute-long video. Pick yourself up by the bootstraps and stop relying on charity.

                  • LemminaryEnglish
                    6•8 months ago

                    I literally don’t need to. Weird way to back out of this one, huh. Kinda hypocritical.

              • LemminaryEnglish
                4•8 months ago

                Or admit that all you want is to take me on a fool’s errand so you can back out of this one. You choose.

                • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                  2•8 months ago

                  That dude does the tactic of “say things in a way that infers they’re talking down to you like a child” in an effort to put forward that they are somehow an authority on information.

                  They provide no details, just refute. No solid statements, just refute.

                  Their whole purpose is to generate discussion that seemingly shows their side has more support than they do.