• mommykink
      link
      fedilink
      117 months ago

      You did it bro. You picked the one objectively wrong choice. Congratulation!

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      If “the area” being evacuated includes Israel, I could potentially get behind this.

        • ivanafterall
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          Alternately, they could just trade. Palestinians get moved to Israel, Israelis get moved to Gaza, since they want it so much.

            • livus
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              South Africa

              I’d love to know your thinking here. You picked the one country that’s been constantly reporting Isreal to the international courts for genocide.

              Or were you imagining a District 9 situation?

              The best candidate for Israel would be the US, that’s where their biggest source of immigrants is. If you’re moving millions of people you’d need to send them to wealthy countries.

                • livus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  Interesring approach. It may not have masses of religions but it’s sometimes called the Rainbow Nation because it has like 8 major ethnicities/cultures.

                  But since the majority of older people were victims of Apartheid (during which Israel supported the racist Apartheid regime at the time) and South Africa have been calling out Israel for practicing apartheid for decades, it would be about as stirring the pot as you can get.

        • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          ICC Elements of Crimes, Article 6 (e):

          Genocide by forcibly transferring children

          Elements

          1. The perpetrator forcibly transferred one or more persons. *
          2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
          3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
          4. The transfer was from that group to another group.
          5. The person or persons were under the age of 18 years.
          6. The perpetrator knew, or should have known, that the person or persons were under the age of 18 years.
          7. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction

          * The term “forcibly” is not restricted to physical force, but may include threat of force or coercion, such as that caused by fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or abuse of power, against such person or persons or another person, or by taking advantage of a coercive environment