Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works
gizmodo.com
This AI hype cycle has dramatically distorted society's views of what's possible with image upscalers.

It was honestly only a matter of time before someone thought we could try that thing where they identify a license plate from a reflection in some dude’s pupil for realsies.

Puloka’s lawyers reportedly used an “expert” in creative video production who’d never worked on a criminal case before to “enhance” the video. The AI tool this unnamed expert used was developed by Texas-based Topaz Labs, which is available to anyone with an internet connection.

You wouldn’t know this expert though. He goes to a different school.

Large language models like ChatGPT have convinced otherwise intelligent people that these chatbots are capable of complex reasoning when that’s simply not what’s happening under the hood.

And at least the judge here had more than five brain cells and shut that circus down. Let’s hope this sets a precedent.

  • AutoTL;DRBEnglish
    1•8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial.

    And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

    Lawyers for Puloka wanted to introduce cellphone video captured by a bystander that’s been AI-enhanced, though it’s not clear what they believe could be gleaned from the altered footage.

    For example, there was a widespread conspiracy theory that Chris Rock was wearing some kind of face pad when he was slapped by Will Smith at the Academy Awards in 2022.

    Using the slider below, you can see the pixelated image that went viral before people started feeding it through AI programs and “discovered” things that simply weren’t there in the original broadcast.

    Large language models like ChatGPT have convinced otherwise intelligent people that these chatbots are capable of complex reasoning when that’s simply not what’s happening under the hood.

    The original article contains 730 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!