• Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    72
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Irrelevant. Someone apparently forgot how to math.

    If she retired, right fucking now, the GOP would block a new SCotUS pick until they were in power again & the democrats would allow that to happen.

    Let’s have this conversation again when it’s a guarantee she can be replaced by a qualified jurist, and not Judge Beer 2.0

    • Baron Von J
      link
      fedilink
      488 months ago

      The Republicans already removed the filibuster for SCOTUS appointments during Trump’s term. Ketanji Brown Jackson was confirmed with a vote of 53 to 47 and the Democratic majority in the Senate is bigger now than it was then.

      • Jaysyn
        link
        fedilink
        41
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Oh hell, I forgot about that, thank you.

        She should fucking retire then. Let’s put a brilliant, healthy 30something in there as her replacement.

      • @chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        58 months ago

        What does removing the filibuster mean? I thought you could filibuster anything you want? Just get up there and make a speech for days and days.

        • @BertramDitore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 months ago

          What you’re describing is a “talking filibuster” where members monopolize the floor so debate can’t continue until they stop. That’s part of it, but that doesn’t happen much anymore in reality. Removing the filibuster for judicial nominees basically just means the threshold for a vote is a simple majority, not a 60 member minimum.

          It’s annoyingly complicated and the term “filibuster” has taken on a cultural meaning that is simpler than what it is in reality. These folks explain it pretty well.