• @Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      123 months ago

      They are but you can’t challenge it until they run and even then its not worth it to fight it until they’re elected at which point you ask for an injunction to prevent them being installed while you actually challenge their ability to be seated.

      • @gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They are but you can’t challenge it until they run

        It looks like all these people are already running though?

        and even then its not worth it to fight it until they’re elected

        Disagreed, just in general it is always worth fighting to keep anti-democractic insurrectionists out of government, plus I could see a court saying something like

        “Well, we don’t like allowing insurrectionists in government, but we also don’t like going against the will of the people, and they did win. Maybe if this has been challenged far enough in advance that the Republicans had a reasonable opportunity to find a different candidate to run we’d be ok doing this, but now it just feels anti-democractic… Karl Popper? Never heard of him.”

        • @Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -13 months ago

          You misunderstand, the legal battle isn’t worth it until they win because the battle will be expensive as fuck and if they lose it never needed to have money spent on it.

          Politics are a marathon not a sprint and a big part of that is knowing when to fight and lose money for a pyrrhic victory and when the ends don’t justify the means.