• Comrade GitGudOP
    link
    fedilink
    263 months ago

    If the choices are fascism or moderate fascism, maybe try offering something better than fascism?

    • originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      -23 months ago

      if my only choice is evil i will always automatically choose less evil. its really not even a choice.

      if we really care about this shit, we would be pushing grass-roots ranked-choice voting to incur actual 3rd parties that matter. but we arent. so less evil it is. you can choose more evil if that makes you feel better, but you should know youre fucking everyone else over.

      • Comrade GitGudOP
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Or you can choose something else entirely and not support a genocide. Turns out, if enough people do this, there’s even a small chance they might win. There’s even a chance that if they don’t win that this will push or even terrorize one of the major parties into moving to your position. But perhaps your conscience allows you to support a genocide. I certainly don’t have the stomach for that though.

        Edit: A word

        • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          83 months ago

          Who are you suggesting to vote for in the US presidential race that doesn’t support Israel?

            • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              -73 months ago

              They didn’t even know what they’re talking about, they don’t even understand the US electoral system.

              • roguetrick
                link
                fedilink
                113 months ago

                So your argument is they don’t understand the US presidential system because a vote against Biden in the Wisconsin Democratic primary is a vote for Trump?

                • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -9
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  No. I say that based on their own comments in this post.

                  Edit. This community is ridiculous. It’s all people that don’t live in the US, and Don’t have a grasp on the US voting system, trying to tell other people in the US how they should vote. Fuck off. I’m blocking this nonsense comm. You all can have fun circle jerking each other.

                • Comrade GitGudOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  53 months ago

                  Once you two are done licking hole in here you feel free to come back out to join the rest of us.

        • originalucifer
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          i live in the US where my choice is evil or more evil.

          youre telling me to choose more evil

          choosing more evil at home might make you feel better about foreign policy, you are voting against your own ability to make this choice in the future. you are making your home life worse thinking you are helping people abroad, but in the long run you are not only helping evil at home, you are not going to help those abroad as the US is more than the president. it is silly to pretend trump will do anything but help russia and israel.

          again, you only have 2 choices evil or more evil. pick one.

          • Red Army Dog Cooper
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            that is a false dilema, you also have, writting “Fuck Off I want someone better” on the ballot in that spot. Does it count as a vote… no… is it evil, no in the choice I gave you you did not chose evil at all.

          • @yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You have a secret, third choice, not seen successfully on a US president since Kennedy.

          • Comrade GitGudOP
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            Does the US not permit Write-In candidates or third parties? Crazy, I could have sworn they did. A miniscule, even infinitesimal chance of winning by voting for a not evil candidate sounds more morally palatable to me than voting for a war criminal. You do you though, I’m quite certain your conscience can handle it.

            • originalucifer
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              yes and no. depends on the state, but reality dictates in our current system and with the current candidates every vote for 3rd party will be a tacit vote for trump.

              dont vote? thats a vote for trump. vote for a 3rd party? thats a vote for trump.

              until we have an actual system that supports 3rd parties we have no choice. because the vote for trump/republicans leads to a system with less parties than 2, not more.

              my conscience says i want more parties. my conscience says ‘vote less evil not more’.

              • Comrade GitGudOP
                link
                fedilink
                53 months ago

                Amazing! All those votes that came in for Trump and they could have just voted 3rd party instead to get the same result! Why does anyone even bother voting for Trump? They could just vote for the person with the shortest name that isn’t Biden!

              • Red Army Dog Cooper
                link
                fedilink
                43 months ago

                no they are not “votes for trump” are they votes biden is not getting yes, however the only way they are “Votes for trump” is if you are starting with the assumption that Biden either already has or inharently deserves the votes. He does not, he does not have my vote and not giving it to him is taking a vote from him. he has to earn it, and he has not

              • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                Actually if the US became a single party state for a term because there is no difference between the established parties, assuming first past the post is still in place, a 2nd party would be forced into electoral relevancy, so that would actually be the preferred outcome of not voting for the current two parties.

              • @Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                13 months ago

                Third party votes being for Trump is only correct if you assume libertarian votes are for Biden.

        • @ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          -43 months ago

          Turns out, if enough people do this, there’s even a small chance they might win.

          Do you have an examples you’d like to cite of this happening in the context of a US presidential election?

            • @ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              -13 months ago

              Oh so, what’s the arithmetic for how many times this has happened?

              0 + 0 = 0

              Coincidentally, that’s also the likelihood of this happening.

              • Comrade GitGudOP
                link
                fedilink
                63 months ago

                Well thank god such a renowned statistician has taken an interest in this subject.

                • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -5
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  You’re already in here pretending to be a renowned electoral scholar. I say thier math adds up better than yours.

        • SUPAVILLAIN
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          The country I was born in is full of collaborators; and I promise, if anyone ever comes along asking me to sell them out for citizenship elsewhere I’ll do it in a New York minute

      • ReallyKinda
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        I have a beetle and a spider in front of me. Which one should I squish? It’s all on you!!!

      • @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        This is the same logic as those people who argue that bombing Japan actually saved lives, because an invasion would’ve resulted in more deaths. You’ve been brainwashed. Full stop.

      • Comrade GitGudOP
        link
        fedilink
        143 months ago

        I think fascism and support for a genocide tend to go hand in hand, so maybe I’m just getting there by working backwards.

        • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          That’s some terrible logic right there.Fascism also goes “hand in hand” with getting the trains to run on time.

          Treaties and allies are complicated. And Israel has been a long ally to the US. Breaking that relationship potentially removes a US presence in the middle east and impacts our intelligence gathering capabilities. Something that could have a lasting impact on US security.

          I’m not defending Israel. But what Israel is doing is being done by Israel.