@3volver@lemmy.world to General Discussion@lemmy.worldEnglish • 8 months agoDoes this plan make sense? v3lemmy.worldimagemessage-square428fedilinkarrow-up1728arrow-down186
arrow-up1642arrow-down1imageDoes this plan make sense? v3lemmy.world@3volver@lemmy.world to General Discussion@lemmy.worldEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square428fedilink
minus-square@notfromhere@lemmy.mllinkfedilink1•8 months agoWhy do you think the states govts should continue to exist if they do not have a direct voice at the Federal level?
minus-square@3volver@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilink1•8 months agoBecause states would still get a voice at the Federal level with the House, not directly and disproportionately, but rather through their population who are the ones who create value.
minus-square@notfromhere@lemmy.mllinkfedilink1•8 months agoThe house is representation of the people. The senate is the voice of the states. E.g. senate ratifies treaties.
Why do you think the states govts should continue to exist if they do not have a direct voice at the Federal level?
Because states would still get a voice at the Federal level with the House, not directly and disproportionately, but rather through their population who are the ones who create value.
The house is representation of the people. The senate is the voice of the states. E.g. senate ratifies treaties.