Legislators in at least two U.S. states are citing a recent decision in England to restrict gender transitions for young people as support for their own related proposals.

They weren’t the first to turn to other countries, notably in Europe, for policy and research ideas. Lawmakers across the U.S., where at least 23 states now have tightened or removed access to transgender health care for minors, have routinely cited non-U.S. research or policies as justification for their legislation.

Yet leading health organizations in the United States and Europe continue to decisively endorse gender-affirming care for both transgender youths and adults.

Among other things, they argue that restrictions on things like hormone therapy tend to single out transgender youths, even though other young people also can benefit from them. And transgender advocates and allies see a political attempt to erase them, cloaked as concern for children.

  • BombOmOm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -168 months ago

    Children are not receiving gender affirming surgery.

    Then banning such elective surgeries for minors is not a problem.

      • BombOmOm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -138 months ago

        Nobody is talking about mastectomies to remove cancer. We are talking about banning minors from elective surgeries.

        • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          98 months ago

          Depending on the circumstances, surgery to excise cancer can be elective. Don’t even fight me on this one, my family has a history of elective surgery to remove cancer.

          • BombOmOm
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -14
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Again, we aren’t talking about mastectomies to remove cancer. We are talking about elective mastectomies (and other surgeries) classified as gender affirming care. Removing cancer is not gender affirming care.

            • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              108 months ago

              Again, my family has had elective mastectomies to excise cancer. This is relevant, because these laws are in the same vein as “abortion is banned, except to save the life of a mother”. We’ve seen how that turns out.