@return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 8 months agoBernie Sanders unveils 32-hour workweek bill with no loss in pay for workersthehill.comexternal-linkmessage-square323fedilinkarrow-up11.65Karrow-down125cross-posted to: conservative@lemm.eeleftism@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.worldworkreform@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.62Karrow-down1external-linkBernie Sanders unveils 32-hour workweek bill with no loss in pay for workersthehill.com@return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 8 months agomessage-square323fedilinkcross-posted to: conservative@lemm.eeleftism@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.worldworkreform@lemmy.world
minus-square@JustARaccoon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•8 months agoI felt like “/s” gives the “joke” away so I opted not to have it and have people actually think critically, especially since the statement is false.
minus-squareCosmic Clericlinkfedilink0•8 months agoDo you think the joke matched the comment it was replying to, which was about calling your house representative?
minus-square@AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoIt’s what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits.
minus-squareCosmic Clericlinkfedilink1•8 months ago It’s what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits. Fair enough, and that’s the answer I was looking for. The majority of the comment was about contacting your house representative, but you’re right, it could match the first sentence, I guess. I kind of wished they would have quoted that first sentence as part of their reply with the joke, to save me some time in replying.
minus-squareCosmic Clericlinkfedilink1•edit-28 months ago lighten up Not a matter of lightening up, its a matter of trying to understand, as it seems like such a non sequitur. Is it really so hard to believe that somebody would want to know why somebody replied to them in such a perceived strange and unrelated sort of way?
I felt like “/s” gives the “joke” away so I opted not to have it and have people actually think critically, especially since the statement is false.
Do you think the joke matched the comment it was replying to, which was about calling your house representative?
It’s what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits.
Fair enough, and that’s the answer I was looking for.
The majority of the comment was about contacting your house representative, but you’re right, it could match the first sentence, I guess.
I kind of wished they would have quoted that first sentence as part of their reply with the joke, to save me some time in replying.
It’s a cynical statement, lighten up
Not a matter of lightening up, its a matter of trying to understand, as it seems like such a non sequitur.
Is it really so hard to believe that somebody would want to know why somebody replied to them in such a perceived strange and unrelated sort of way?