The appearance at a health center will be the latest leg in a nationwide tour by Ms. Harris, who has emerged as the most outspoken defender of abortion rights in the administration. While White House officials say they have largely reached the limits of their power to protect abortion rights, the issue has emerged as a linchpin of their re-election strategy.

  • @silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    154 months ago

    First time a President or Vice President has openly visited an abortion clinic. It makes a very clear statement about her (and the Democrats) political position, and is an important part of politicking.

    • Zuberi 👀
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      Gotcha, thanks for the answer. Isn’t it already assumed anybody to the left of R is pro-choice though? Why show this to a base that already understood their stance?

      • @silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        It is not. There is a history of the Democrats including people who are anti-abortion within their tent.

        • Zuberi 👀
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          I kinda think if they actually cared they would have codified Roe during his free reign no? This feels more like a bargaining chip than anything, same as the random pot seminar.

            • Zuberi 👀
              link
              fedilink
              -14 months ago

              Why vote for either party that put forth the broken Senate rules?

                  • @spongebue@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    24 months ago

                    Not practically, especially when plurality takes all and there’s no ranked choice voting system. Say you had a candidate who was 95% perfect for you, another who was at 80%, and another who agreed with 10% of your beliefs. Now let’s say that only the latter two had a realistic shot. When you throw your vote away on someone who never had a chance, rather than the guy who came close and could’ve won, you may as well have voted for the guy you agreed with least.

                    Take a look at Hawaii’s special election in 2010. This district should have been a shoo-in for a Democrat running against a Republican. But when two Democrats run against a Republican? Their vote splits and the guy with 40% of the vote wins - even though one of the other two better lined up with 60% of the voters

                    Thanks for playing, though.

              • Schadrach
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                Because unless most of the populous is going for the same alternative you are, voting for some other party mostly benefits the major party farthest from your views. It’s a consequence of FPTP, which always collapses into a two party system.