Its free, open source software folks. Its fine to not be happy about a projects direction, but these comments are really treading the “I payed them $0 and I demand my moneys worth!” line.
He spent 4 months working on another free, open source project bexause he wanted to. That’s perfectly fair on his part. Working for $0 on things you want to work on is a sane and basic right we all have. The work may even help lemmy in an as yet unknown way.
You are as equally free as the lemmy dev to work on moderation tools. The fact that you have put in the same amount of work as the dev should tamp down the criticism a ways.
Now if you donate to the lemmy devs directly, fire away. If you want to contribute directly, Rust is an excellent programming language that fits very well with the solarpunk ethos. It’s incredibly efficient, so code uses less power than alternates, it’s memory safe, so it by default eliminates 75% of the most common computer bugs, leading to safety, stability and reliability of the products it runs on, and its community is enthusiastic, which should ensure its longevity for decades to come. Learning it might be a good avenue if you want to help lemmy.
I’m not concerned because a person is choosing how they spend their spare time. I’m concerned because a person only has so much free time, and Lemmy development is already struggling.
Also the premise of it being free changes when people are paying specifically these two devs thousands of dollars to work on Lemmy, but that’s not what I’m concerned about.
The other lemmy dev has side projects that don’t concern me (such as an android keyboard). I’m specifically concerned about this Wikipedia project because they already know they can’t keep up with the demands of Lemmy and now they want to build a second federated platform.
Again, not concerned about them choosing to spend their time on this, but I am concerned about Lemmy the software and it’s road map out of beta.
I think thats a valid stance overall, but as is often the case with useful FOSS, there are thousands of demands with only so many people actually helping in anyway. The demands can easy overwhelm a dev who at some point made something useful “just because.” To go from “I wanted to make something that helped” to “I have 5000 people making demands” is an immense strain, and one that kills FOSS, even very good FOSS, all the time.
I think if you are one of the people donating money, you can have more direct issues, because you are paying into lemmy to make it better. I think if you submit pull requests or bug reports or write documentation for lemmy, you can lean into complaints more.
If you are on lemmy, offering nothing to improve it, then you need to temper your frustrations a ways and realize the devs are just as entitled to not have the “thing you want done” as anyone else.
They very well may have needed to take a break from lemmy dev to avoid burnout, or maybe they are waiting on the their peer or something else to push forward on “feature X.” Maybe this federated wiki has future lemmy features they wanted to test. None of us know, and honestly anyone not lending a hand doesnt have the right to demand anything.
at some point i hope people do start to realize that open source means they get worked on by people, when they feel like it.
that cuts both ways. for some things it’s great, for some things it’s not. the end result can be great, but sometimes it takes a REALLY long time to get there.
With the same level of logic and proof, I feel free to say that since you’ve never made a film, released an album or published a novel, you’re not allowed to criticise any of them or the people who have.
edit: It should be noted that @mosiacmango@lemm.ee edited their post after my reply to remove the bad arguments as well as the accusations originally levelled at @Dave@lemmy.nz and me, accusations that couldn’t possibly be backed up. It now reads more reasonable and balanced.
I certainly have never used a free product to criticize that product while contributing nothing and demanding more from the people giving it away for free.
“This food is terrible, and the portions are so small!”
The minute I use a free film to complain about said film, you’ll have a point. Until then, this is just you making excuses for your entitlement.
just remember, at some point, two dudes had a barroom bet. one of them insisted that ‘anyone can make a movie’. in the course of proving his point, he spent $19,000 and made a film that some consider to be one of the worst movies ever made.
Interesting that they don’t have time to add decent moderation tools, but do have time for this.
Its free, open source software folks. Its fine to not be happy about a projects direction, but these comments are really treading the “I payed them $0 and I demand my moneys worth!” line.
He spent 4 months working on another free, open source project bexause he wanted to. That’s perfectly fair on his part. Working for $0 on things you want to work on is a sane and basic right we all have. The work may even help lemmy in an as yet unknown way.
You are as equally free as the lemmy dev to work on moderation tools. The fact that you have put in the same amount of work as the dev should tamp down the criticism a ways.
Now if you donate to the lemmy devs directly, fire away. If you want to contribute directly, Rust is an excellent programming language that fits very well with the solarpunk ethos. It’s incredibly efficient, so code uses less power than alternates, it’s memory safe, so it by default eliminates 75% of the most common computer bugs, leading to safety, stability and reliability of the products it runs on, and its community is enthusiastic, which should ensure its longevity for decades to come. Learning it might be a good avenue if you want to help lemmy.
I’m not concerned because a person is choosing how they spend their spare time. I’m concerned because a person only has so much free time, and Lemmy development is already struggling.
Also the premise of it being free changes when people are paying specifically these two devs thousands of dollars to work on Lemmy, but that’s not what I’m concerned about.
The other lemmy dev has side projects that don’t concern me (such as an android keyboard). I’m specifically concerned about this Wikipedia project because they already know they can’t keep up with the demands of Lemmy and now they want to build a second federated platform.
Again, not concerned about them choosing to spend their time on this, but I am concerned about Lemmy the software and it’s road map out of beta.
I think thats a valid stance overall, but as is often the case with useful FOSS, there are thousands of demands with only so many people actually helping in anyway. The demands can easy overwhelm a dev who at some point made something useful “just because.” To go from “I wanted to make something that helped” to “I have 5000 people making demands” is an immense strain, and one that kills FOSS, even very good FOSS, all the time.
I think if you are one of the people donating money, you can have more direct issues, because you are paying into lemmy to make it better. I think if you submit pull requests or bug reports or write documentation for lemmy, you can lean into complaints more.
If you are on lemmy, offering nothing to improve it, then you need to temper your frustrations a ways and realize the devs are just as entitled to not have the “thing you want done” as anyone else.
They very well may have needed to take a break from lemmy dev to avoid burnout, or maybe they are waiting on the their peer or something else to push forward on “feature X.” Maybe this federated wiki has future lemmy features they wanted to test. None of us know, and honestly anyone not lending a hand doesnt have the right to demand anything.
at some point i hope people do start to realize that open source means they get worked on by people, when they feel like it.
that cuts both ways. for some things it’s great, for some things it’s not. the end result can be great, but sometimes it takes a REALLY long time to get there.
With the same level of logic and proof, I feel free to say that since you’ve never made a film, released an album or published a novel, you’re not allowed to criticise any of them or the people who have.
edit: It should be noted that @mosiacmango@lemm.ee edited their post after my reply to remove the bad arguments as well as the accusations originally levelled at @Dave@lemmy.nz and me, accusations that couldn’t possibly be backed up. It now reads more reasonable and balanced.
I certainly have never used a free product to criticize that product while contributing nothing and demanding more from the people giving it away for free.
“This food is terrible, and the portions are so small!”
The minute I use a free film to complain about said film, you’ll have a point. Until then, this is just you making excuses for your entitlement.
just remember, at some point, two dudes had a barroom bet. one of them insisted that ‘anyone can make a movie’. in the course of proving his point, he spent $19,000 and made a film that some consider to be one of the worst movies ever made.
he was right though.
You mean Manos: The Hands of Fate? I wondered if you were talking about The Room at first.
Something something could, something something should. Centralized Wikipedia is not a problem in need of a solution.
Says you. The dev disagreed and did the work. Even if hes wrong, it’s good that he tried to bring change, to give people options.
Isn’t changing things and trying to help the world what solarpunk is about?